Monday, January 19, 2015

Ninth Circuit Rules That Ineffective Assistance of Counsel is Not a Mitigating Sentencing Factor

The case is United States v. Dibe. Claudio Dibe pled guilty, without a plea agreement, to wire fraud and received a below Guidelines sentence. He complained on appeal that his sentence would have been lower if the sentencing court had considered his counsel's ineffective assistance in failing to adequately explain the benefits of the government's initial plea offer. The Ninth Circuit held that ineffective assistance of counsel cannot be considered as a mitigating under 18 U.S.C. Section 3553(a). Distinguishing the U.S. Supreme Court's opinion in Pepper v. United States, 131 S.Ct. 1229 (2011), the Ninth Circuit noted that counsel's alleged ineffective assistance "has nothing to do with [Dibe's] own conduct."

(wisenberg)

https://lawprofessors.typepad.com/whitecollarcrime_blog/2015/01/ninth-circuit-rules-that-ineffective-assistance-of-counsel-is-not-a-mitigating-sentencing-factor.html

Judicial Opinions, Sentencing | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

https://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef01b7c73ac276970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Ninth Circuit Rules That Ineffective Assistance of Counsel is Not a Mitigating Sentencing Factor:

Comments

Post a comment