Monday, January 12, 2015
Heads I Win, Tails You Lose: Using the Defendant's Trial Testimony to Determine the Guideline Range
In United States v. Norman, the defendant was convicted of wire fraud conspiracy after a jury trial in which he testified in his own behalf. The sentencing court assessed two points against Norman for obstruction, based on the defendant's allegedly perjurious trial testimony. But the judge also determined amount of loss and number of victims based on Norman's testimonial admissions. On appeal, Norman objected to this as inconsistent and procedurally unreasonable. The Second Circuit unsurprisingly disagreed, noting that the trial judge was free to accept some and reject some of Norman's testimony. Moreover, even though the trial judge found that appellant's admissions regarding amount of loss and number of victims were corroborated by other evidence, the Second Circuit said that this was not necessary. There is no need for a sentencing court to corroborate the defendant's in-court admissions before using them to determine sentencing factors.
https://lawprofessors.typepad.com/whitecollarcrime_blog/2015/01/heads-i-win-tails-you-lose-using-the-defendants-trial-testimony-under-to-determine-the-guideline-ran.html