Monday, January 4, 2021
Goldberg discusses particular questions to consider when handling your IRA, like retirement and tax considerations.
The intro paragraph is pasted below for an introductory into the nature of the Article.
Roth IRA conversions is a tactic that has gained ground, post- SECURE Act. Roth conversions must be mathematically compared to doing nothing. An important driver here is the possibility of income tax rate arbitrage. Will the account owner be able to convert some traditional IRA dollars to the Roth side at lower tax rates than future beneficiaries will likely pay.
See https://www.irahelp.com/pdf/Goldberg-202101.pdf for the full article.
The University of Dayton School of Law invites applications for a tenure-track Assistant Professor position to begin August 16, 2021. Areas of particular need include contracts, secured transactions, business organizations, property, wills and trusts, and/or tax.
Applicants must have a J.D. or the equivalent degree from a foreign institution. While not everyone may possess all the preferred qualifications, the ideal candidate will bring many of the following: an outstanding academic record; a record of publication; demonstrated potential to be an outstanding teacher; potential to successfully mentor students from underrepresented groups; demonstrated and successful experience working with people from diverse backgrounds; relevant prior experience in law practice; excellent communication skills; effective interpersonal skills with various constituencies; interest in and/or experience teaching contracts, secured transactions, business organizations, property, wills and trusts, and/or tax, an expressed willingness and enthusiasm to teach in and develop UDSL's hybrid online J.D. program and to engage with Catholic and Marianist educational values that promote inclusive excellence.
Applications must be received by February 1, 2021. Applications should include a cover letter and CV and must be submitted through the University of Dayton’s electronic employment site: https://employment.udayton.edu/cw/en-us/job/498365/assistant-professor. References will not be contacted until second round interviews. Inquiries may be directed to the Faculty Recruitment and Development Committee at email@example.com.
The University of Dayton School of Law is a dynamic law school focused on inclusive excellence. In Spring 2020, National Jurist's preLaw magazine ranked UD Law 14th in the nation for African American students. To meet the needs of its growing J.D. program, the UD Law has hired 13 nationally and internationally prominent faculty in the last four years.
The University of Dayton is a top tier, Catholic research university with offerings from the undergraduate to the doctoral levels. Founded in 1850 by the Society of Mary, the University is a diverse community committed to advancing the common good through intellectual curiosity, academic rigor, and community engagement with local, national and global partnerships. Guided by the Marianist education philosophy, we educate the whole person and link learning and scholarship with leadership and service.
Informed by its Catholic and Marianist mission, the University is committed to the principles of diversity, equity, and inclusion. In light of this commitment, we seek to increase diversity, achieve equitable outcomes, and model inclusion across our campus community. As an Affirmative Action and Equal Opportunity Employer, we will not discriminate against minorities, women, protected veterans, individuals with disabilities, or on the basis of race, color, national origin, religion, sex, sexual orientation, or gender identity.
The University is also pleased to provide support for spouses of prospective and newly hired faculty through its dual career program. While we cannot guarantee placement, we serve as an effective resource and support system for your spouse. Information can be found at http://www.udayton.edu/hr/employee_resources/dual_career_resources.php.
Thursday, December 24, 2020
Andrew S. Gold, John C. Goldberg, Daniel B. Kelly, Emily L. Sherwin, and Henry E. Smith recently published an article entitled, Introduction: The Oxford Handbook of the New Private Law, Wills, Trusts, & Estates Law ejournal (2020). Provided below is the abstract to the Article.
“Private law” embraces the traditional common law subjects (property, contracts, and torts), as well as adjacent more statutory areas such as intellectual property and commercial law. It also includes important areas that have been neglected in the United States but are beginning to make a comeback. These include unjust enrichment, restitution, equity, and remedies more generally. “Private law” can also mean private law as a whole, which invites consideration of issues such as the public-private distinction, the similarities and differences between the various areas of private law, and the institutional framework supporting private law – including courts, arbitrators, and even custom.
The New Private Law is an approach to these subjects that aims to reinvigorate the study of private law by moving beyond reductively instrumentalist policy evaluation and narrow, rule-by-rule, doctrine-by-doctrine analysis, so as to consider and capture how private law’s various features fit and work together, as well as the normative underpinnings of these larger structures. This movement has begun resuscitating the notion of private law itself in the United States and has brought an interdisciplinary perspective to the more traditional, doctrinal approach prevalent in Commonwealth countries. The Handbook embraces a broad range of perspectives to private law – including philosophical, economic, historical, psychological, to name a few – yet it offers a unifying theme of seriousness about the structure and content of private law. This Introduction introduces the New Private Law and briefly summarizes the chapters in the volume.
Robert Flannigan recently published an article entitled, Stock Broker Mutation, Wills, Trusts, & Estates Law ejournal (2020). Provided below is the abstract to the Article.
The principle that agents are status fiduciaries does not apply to stock brokers in Canada. Though brokers are agents with respect to their trading function, the Supreme Court has said that their agent status does not make them accountable as status fiduciaries. I will explain how that mutation developed. I will show that the Supreme Court misconstrued the prior law, and that there is no present justification for the lesser accountability of stock brokers.
Wednesday, December 23, 2020
Article: Obligations And Powers Of Superannuation Trustees Concerning Situations Of Actual Or Possible Conflict
Joseph Campbell recently published an article entitled, Obligations And Powers Of Superannuation Trustees Concerning Situations Of Actual Or Possible Conflict, Wills, Trusts, & Estates Law ejournal (2020). Provided below is the abstract to the Article.
Part 1 summarises the present status as a matter of precedent in Australia of the general law rule that a fiduciary not be in a situation of conflict, the meaning of being “in a situation of conflict”, and the recognised circumstances in which there is an exception to the rule. It also criticises the application of the rule to a superannuation trustee in Jones v AMP Perpetual Trustee Co NZ Ltd . Part 2 considers the relationship of the pre-existing general law and statute law governing trusts to the provisions of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (“SIS Act”). Part 3 considers the effect of the initial introduction of the SIS Act on the application of the no-conflicts rule to superannuation trusts. Part 4 considers how the replacement of the original statutory covenants in the SIS Act with a set that included express obligations concerning conflicts affects the possible application of the general law no-conflicts rule. It argues that it is still possible, in some circumstances, for the general law no-conflicts rule to apply, and considers the limitations on now amending a trust deed that did not already exclude the no-conflicts duty to amend or limit that duty. Part 4 also considers various aspects of the construction and practical application of the new covenants concerning conflicts, including the role of the prudential standards, and some other statutory amendments that came into operation in 2013 and 2019 that bear upon a trustee’s actions in a situation of conflict. Part 5 provides several miscellaneous examples, discussed with particular reference to outsourcing, of principles that do not mention the word “conflict” but that could need to be taken into account when a superannuation trustee is in a situation of conflict.
Jessica Hudson and Charles Mitchell recently published an article entitled, Legal Consequences of the Flawed Exercise of Scheme Powers, Wills, Trusts, & Estates Law ejournal (2020). Provided below is the abstract to the Article.
The paper discusses the powers that are typically conferred on trustees and employers under English occupational pension schemes and Australian superannuation schemes, the legal rules by which the exercise of such powers is governed and the legal consequences of failures to comply with these rules.
Sunday, December 20, 2020
Eric P. Hayes and Frederick D. Royal recently published an article entitled, Representing a Trustee, Wills, Trusts, & Estates law ejournal (2020). Provided below is the abstract to the Article.
The Author's chapter 22, Representing a Trustee, in UNDERSTANDING AND USING TRUSTS, covers the essential issues in Massachusetts trust law and practice. Two critical areas of trust-related law practice are explored in detail: lawyers acting as trustees and lawyers representing trustees. A number of difficult regulatory and ethical issues for these types of practice are raised and covered in depth.
Saturday, December 19, 2020
Susan N. Gary recently published an article entitled, The Electronic Wills Act: Facing the Inevitable, Wills, Trusts, & Estates Law ejournal (2020). Provided below is the abstract to the Article.
In response to increasing legislative activity involving electronic wills, in 2017 the Uniform Law Commission (ULC) appointed the Drafting Committee on Uniform Electronic Wills Act to develop a uniform act providing rules governing the execution of electronic wills. The committee strove to create a statute that would be consistent with existing wills laws but would address differences for wills executed electronically. The committee sought to create rules that would protect the testator from manipulation by others but also from unwanted intestacy.
This article describes, from the perspective of the Reporter, the committee’s process in developing the Electronic Wills Act. The article explains each provision of the Act and describes reasons for decisions made in developing the Act, including decisions to exclude certain ideas from the Act. The article also compares the Act’s provisions with provisions of electronic wills statutes enacted in Arizona, Florida, Indiana, and Nevada. The article concludes with a few recommendations for enactment.
Given the increasing use of electronic documents and electronic signatures, testators will attempt to execute wills electronically. Although lawyers may prefer wills executed on paper, and paper wills will likely be the norm for many years to come, legislatures should consider enacting statutes that can guide and protect testators who prefer to execute their wills electronically. The Electronic Wills Act provides a thoughtfully developed model for states to use.
Thursday, December 10, 2020
Natalie M. Banta recently published an article entitled, ELECTRONIC WILLS AND DIGITAL ASSETS: REASSESSING FORMALITY IN THE DIGITAL AGE, Baylor Law Review (2019). Provided below is the abstract to the Article.
The law of Wills, dating back to 1540, is one of the last holdouts against the digital revolution. In 2019, a will in most states cannot be an electronic document. The Wills Acts adopted by every state in America requires a testamentary will to be in writing, to be signed, and to be attested in the presence of at least two witnesses. States have interpreted the Wills Act, in most cases, to require a physical document printed and signed by hand by a testator and witnesses. For centuries, these pillars of the law of wills have remained resolute and uncompromised. Attempts have been made to lessen the strict requirements of testamentary formality, but only a handful of states have adopted legislation applying what is called the harmless error doctrine. The advent of digital asset succession, however, has taken a more immediate path to encourage chipping away at the formalities for a will. Almost all of the states have adopted digital asset legislation, which only requires a testamentary statement regarding these assets to be in writing in order to be valid. Digital asset legislation opens the door to an even more sweeping change—purely electronic wills. Adopting electronic wills would be a dramatic change to the Wills Act but would not dramatically change property transfers after death. More wealth transfers after death under a nonprobate instrument such as a trust or private contract between a decedent and a financial or insurance company. These testamentary transfers are already largely electronic. Technological changes and expectations in society have been challenging the Wills Act for years. Courts are beginning to broadly interpret the Wills Act to incorporate technological changes. A few states have begun experimenting with versions of electronic wills, and the Uniform Law Commission is proposing legislation to allow electronic wills in the upcoming year. The strict formalities of the Wills Act can still be met by allowing an electronic version of a will. Indeed, as this article argues, electronic wills can serve as reliable evidence of testamentary intent, protecting a testator’s interests, and fulfilling the purposes of succession law. State legislatures should adopt legislation allowing for electronic wills in order to bring a cost-effective and efficient way of transferring assets at death and to encourage more people to exercise their freedom of disposition.
Wednesday, December 9, 2020
Jeffrey A. Cooper recently published an article entitled, Rethinking the Estate Planning Curriculum, Wills, Trusts, & Estates Law ejournal (2020). Provided below is the abstract to the Article.
As a result of recent changes in Federal estate tax law, fewer and fewer clients need sophisticated estate tax planning. Many lawyers are thus spending less time acting as estate tax planners and instead deploying different skills and expertise.
In this brief article, I explore the extent to which law schools are rethinking their curricula as a result. The discussion proceeds in two parts. First, I discuss the curricular changes I have overseen at the law school at which I teach, setting out both the changes made and the assumptions underlying them. Second, relying on a brief survey of other ACTEC Academic Fellows, I explore the extent to which other law schools have been considering similar curricular revisions.