Thursday, January 28, 2010
A recent New York Times article tells the story of one man's wishes regarding life-saving medical treatment. The following excerpt captures the difficult situation that arose when the author disagreed with her father's decision:
I know what I want: I want to stop the insane cycle of hospitalizations and heroic life-saving treatments. It is not helping my father. He is getting sicker. He is dying. . . .
I am acutely tempted to answer, “Of course not — my father would not want heroic measures.” But I hesitate because I know it might not be true.
Assuring that one's wishes regarding end-of-life treatment are followed is just one reason to have a living will.
See Alicia von Stamwitz, An Ill Father, a Life-or-Death Decision, NY Times, Jan. 25, 2010.
Wednesday, January 27, 2010
'Destroyed Community Property, Damaged Persons, and Insurers' Duty to Indemnify Innocent Spouses and Other Co-Insured Fiduciaries: An Attempt to Harmonize Conflicting Federal and State Courts' Declaratory Judgments'
Wiley E. Rice (professor of law, Saint Mary's University) has published his article entitled Destroyed Community Property, Damaged Persons, and Insurers' Duty to Indemnify Innocent Spouses and Other Co-Insured Fiduciaries: An Attempt to Harmonize Conflicting Federal and State Courts' Declaratory Judgments, 2 Estate Plan. & Community Prop. L.J. 63 (2009).
Below are excerpts from the article:
Innocent fiduciary disputes generally, and innocent co-insured spouse actions in particular, generate a lot of conflicting rulings and outcomes within and between state and federal judiciaries. More significant, even after state supreme courts have issued "definitive" innocent co-insured rulings, intra- and interstate court splits continue among state courts. Similarly, intra- and inter-circuit conflicts exist amount the federal circuits. Even more relevant, some legislatures in community property states enacted "innocent spouse" statutes. Put simply, those statutes are designed to protect innocent co-insured spouses' insurable interests, after insured deviant spouses intentionally destroy community property. Still, in light of those statutes, conflicting state and federal court rulings and declarations persist.
. . .
This article concludes by encouraging state and federal judges to apply more carefully settled, equitable doctrines to interpret insurance contracts and to award or deny innocent co-insureds petitions for declaratory relief. Current and past courts have considered illusive public policy to interpret valid insurance contacts, and that practice helps to generate judicial conflicts.
The Court agreed with Trustee that County Court at Law lacked jurisdiction and thus its judgment was void. The Court began its analysis by explaining that subject matter jurisdiction cannot be waived and thus it was permissible for Trustee to raise the issue at this time. The Court then studied Trust Code § 115.001 which grants district courts exclusive jurisdiction over trust matters except for certain situations not relevant to this case such as in counties where there is a statutory probate court. The Court examined the Government Code to see if any other ground existed to permit County Court at Law to have trust jurisdiction and found none. According, the County Court at Law’s judgment was void and it must transfer the case back to District Court.
Moral: Except for the limited exceptions in Trust Code § 115.001(d), cases involving trusts are heard in district courts.
Carroll v. Carroll, 53 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 245 (Tex. 2010).
While these websites have the potential to be very useful, they could also cause problems. Aside from security concerns related to online data storage, at least one of these websites also offers do-it-yourself online will writing and drafting of other legal documents. The following excerpt from Michael S. Rosenwald, Web sites let online lives outlast the dearly departed, Wash. Post, Jan. 25, 2010, points out a feature of one website that could also lead to potential problems:
With Deathswitch.com, if users don't respond to regular e-mails to confirm that they are still alive, the site gets increasingly worried about them, sending notes that nearly beg for a reply: "Please log on using the link below to demonstrate that you are still alive." If users don't respond within a set period of time, "postmortem" e-mails stored in their account are delivered.
The missives could be basic information, such as e-mail passwords sent to a girlfriend or banking data to relatives -- or more emotionally explosive notes that tell a spouse or friend what couldn't be said during life.
See Michael S. Rosenwald,Web sites let online lives outlast the dearly departed, Wash. Post, Jan. 25, 2010.
Special thanks to Joel Dobris (Professor of Law, UC Davis School of Law) for bringing this to my attention.
Tuesday, January 26, 2010
According to the Wealth Strategies Journal, the Senate has taken the procedural steps necessary for putting HR 4154, an estate tax bill, on the Senate Calendar. This could lead to bypassing the Senate Finance Committee entirely. The House approved the bill in December of 2009.
This month, The Trust Advisor Blog has featured two postings on Westwood Holdings Group, Inc. and its trust company Westwood Trust. This Texas wealth management firm brought in $2 billion in new assets from Sept. 30, 2008 to Sept. 30, 2009 by actively seeking out new clients and using common trust funds, which have fewer associated charges and expenses for the client.
The following regarding Westwood is taken from Jerry Cooper, Westwood Trust Shines Helping Advisor Pull In $2 Billion in New Accounts During Meltdown, The Trust Advisor Blog, Jan. 8, 2010:
When looking at Westwood it’s best to view Westwood in comparison to its peers. The quick take snap shot provided by Morningstar gives Westwood stellar financial grades. There are only three firms in the group which include Franklin Resources and T. Rowe Price that have “A” financial health ratings.
Westwood’s market cap is only $268 million while the market cap of T. Rowe Price is $14 billion and Franklin’s is $25 billion. So for a small company being managed efficiently they have done quite well in comparison to their peers. Westwood is also accorded a “B” rating in profitability from the Morningstar analysis. fer agent or fund supermarket fees that are normally part of a mutual fund fee structure.
See also Jerry Cooper, Westwood Trust’s “Common Trust Funds” Emerge as Bellwether Business Model for Advisors, The Trust Advisor Blog, Jan. 22, 2010.
To all my readers, I greatly appreciate your support and contributions.
This week the Los Angelos Superior Court judge presiding over the probate and administration of Michael Jackson's estate will conduct a hearing on Joe Jackson's request for a monthly allowance from his son's estate. The estate opposes the monthly allowance of $15,000 because Joe Jackson was not dependent on his son nor was he included in his son's will.
Also, for a picture gallery of art commissioned by Jackson, including the painting pictured here, see Telegraph.UK, Michael Jackson art: paintings by David Nordahl and portraits and sculptures by other artists.
The ABA is offering complimentary web-cast registration for law students for the seminar entitled Ensure the Pet's Continued Care: Advising Your Clients about Planning for Their Pet's Care which will be held on February 2, 2010.
Law students may register by following this link: http://www.abanet.org/rpte/eCLE/programs/2010/RP0TPT/reg-student.html.
Monday, January 25, 2010
The following is the introduction to the article:
The time has come to debunk a myth that has pervaded Texas court decisions and legislation for more than 40 years. We must all face the truth. Once and for all: There is no such thing as “community debt.”
This article gives a brief overview of the basic tenets of Texas marital property law and discusses the legislative scheme for handling marital liability debts. Importantly, it addresses the source of the mythical concept that is community debt and identifies existing statutes that perpetuate the community debt misnomer. Finally, this article calls for Texas courts and the Legislature to incorporate current law into opinions and legislation so as to eliminate confusion among practitioners and the public alike.