Wills, Trusts & Estates Prof Blog

Editor: Gerry W. Beyer
Texas Tech Univ. School of Law

Wednesday, June 28, 2006

Court rejects latent/patent distinction

In University of Southern Indiana v. Baker, 843 N.E.2d 528 (Ind. 2006), the Supreme Court of Indiana rejected the distinction between latent and patent ambiguities. The decedent’s will poured over to her trust, in which she gave all of her automobiles, furnishings, “and other personal property” to her brother, a gift of $10,000 to a friend, and the residue of the trust proper to charity. The probate court found and the intermediate appellate courts affirmed that the language gave all of the decedent’s tangible and intangible personal property to her brother. The Supreme Court reversed based on extrinsic evidence, saying the distinction between latent and patent ambiguities “no longer serves any useful purpose” and that all relevant extrinsic evidence may be considered when resolving an ambiguity.


New Cases, Trusts, Wills | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:


Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Court rejects latent/patent distinction:


Post a comment