TortsProf Blog

Editor: Christopher J. Robinette
Southwestern Law School

Thursday, April 23, 2009

Hylton on Intent in Tort Law

Keith Hylton (Boston) has posted on SSRN Intent in Tort Law.  Here is the abstract:

This paper, prepared for the 2009 Monsanto Lecture in Tort Jurisprudence, explains intent standards in tort law on the basis of the incentive effects of tort liability rules. Intent rules serve a regulatory function by internalizing costs optimally. The intent standard for battery internalizes costs in a manner that discourages socially harmful acts and at the same time avoids discouraging socially beneficial activity. The intent standard for assault is more difficult to satisfy than that for battery because it is designed to provide a subsidy of a sort to the speech that is often intermixed with potentially threatening conduct. In addition to the optimal internalization goal, transaction costs play a role in the specification of intent requirements. The subtle difference between the intent requirements for trespass and battery can be explained on the basis of transaction costs.

--CJR

https://lawprofessors.typepad.com/tortsprof/2009/04/hylton-on-intent-in-tort-law.html

Scholarship | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

https://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef01156f4e9255970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Hylton on Intent in Tort Law:

Comments

Post a comment