Securities Law Prof Blog

Editor: Eric C. Chaffee
Univ. of Toledo College of Law

Wednesday, November 10, 2021

New Securities Law Articles in Print

The following law review articles relating to securities regulation are now available in paper format:

Ido Baum & Dov Solomon, When Should You Abstain? A Call for a Global Rule of Insider Trading, 88 U. Cin. L. Rev. 67 (2019).

Max Birmingham, Whistle While You Work: Interpreting Retaliation Remedies Available to Whistleblowers in the Dodd-Frank Act, 13 Fla. A & M U. L. Rev. 1 (2017).

Paul Brest, Ronald J. Gilson & Mark A. Wolfson, How Investors Can (and Can't) Create Social Value, 44 J. Corp. L. 205 (2019).

Elizabeth F. Brown & Edward F. Buckley, A Preliminary Look at State Structures for Regulating Financial Services, 87 U. Cin. L. Rev. 891 (2019).

Deborah A. DeMott, Whistleblowers: Implications for Corporate Governance, 98 Wash. U. L. Rev. 1645 (2021).

Joseph A. Franco, Commoditized Governance: The Curious Case of Investment Company Shared Series Trusts, 44 J. Corp. L. 233 (2019).

Virginia Harper Ho, Disclosure Overload? Lessons for Risk Disclosure & ESG Reporting Reform from the Regulation S-K Concept Release, 65 Vill. L. Rev. 67 (2020).

Colleen Honigsberg, Shivaram Rajgopal & Suraj Srinivasan, The Changing Landscape of Auditors' Liability, 63 J.L. & Econ. 367 (2020).

Hadar Jabotinsky & Mathias Siems, How to Regulate the Regulators: Applying Principles of Good Corporate Governance to Financial Regulatory Authorities,
44 J. Corp. L. 351 (2019).

Lynnise E. Phillips Pantin, Race and Equity in the Age of Unicorns, 72 Hastings L.J. 1453 (2021).

Edward Rivin, Note, Section 14(e)'s Culpability Requirement: Scienter v. Negligence, 88 U. Cin. L. Rev. 289 (2019).

Amanda M. Rose, A Response to Calls for SEC-Mandated ESG Disclosure, 98 Wash. U. L. Rev. 1821 (2021).

Nitzan Shilon, Stock Buyback Ability to Enhance CEO Compensation: Theory, Evidence, and Policy Implications, 25 Lewis & Clark L. Rev. 303 (2021).

Chang-Hsien Tsai, To Regulate or Not to Regulate? A Comparison of Government Responses to Peer-to-Peer Lending among the United States, China, and Taiwan, 87 U. Cin. L. Rev. 1077 (2019).

| Permalink