Securities Law Prof Blog

Editor: Eric C. Chaffee
Univ. of Toledo College of Law

Friday, March 23, 2018

Sharfman on Dual Class Shares

I have been catching up on some online reading.  Bernard S. Sharfman has a great post on SEC Commissioner Robert Jackson and Perpetual Dual Class Shares over at the Oxford Business Law Blog.  It is well worth a read.

March 23, 2018 | Permalink | Comments (0)

Wednesday, March 21, 2018

Shaw on Whistleblowing

Todd W. Shaw has posted When Text and Policy Conflict: Internal Whistleblowing Under the Shadow of Dodd-Frank on SSRN with the following abstract:

This Article considers whether the text of the Dodd-Frank Act protects internal whistleblowers from retaliation, and if not, whether it should. After the economic meltdown following the 2008 financial crisis, Congress extended protections to corporate whistleblowers by enacting Dodd-Frank. Since then, numerous lower federal courts have disagreed over whether Dodd-Frank’s whistleblower protections apply to employees who report their employer’s securities violations internally, but not to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). In Digital Realty Trust, Inc. v. Somers, the Supreme Court resolved this division of authority by holding that Dodd-Frank’s whistleblower protections only apply to employees who report their employer’s securities violations to the SEC.

After discussing current statutory and case law, this Article makes two claims. First, it argues that the Court’s decision in Digital Realty is correct as a matter of statutory interpretation. While those who may disagree with the Court’s holding have advanced strong policy arguments to support their position, such arguments cannot trump the unambiguous meaning of Dodd-Frank’s text. That meaning confirms that Dodd-Frank’s whistleblower protections do not apply to internal whistleblowers. And even if Dodd-Frank’s text initially appears ambiguous, its legislative history resolves this ambiguity by confirming that only whistleblowers who report misconduct to the SEC are protected.

Nevertheless, this Article further argues that Congress should amend Dodd-Frank to protect from retaliation employees who only report their employer’s securities violations internally. The novel and easily-adoptable amendment that this Article proposes has the potential to reduce the vulnerability of certain classes of employees to employer retaliation, incentivize employees to make internal disclosures of securities violations, and reduce the costs of investigations by channeling them internally. Most importantly, the proposed amendment would align Dodd-Frank with the doctrinal foundation of whistleblower programs in the United States, which is the idea that regulatory compliance requires robust external and internal whistleblower protections.

March 21, 2018 | Permalink | Comments (0)

New Securities Law Articles in Print

The following law review articles relating to securities regulation are now available in paper format:

Heather Hughes, Property and the True-Sale Doctrine, 19 U. Pa. J. Bus. L. 870 (2017).

Alec Smith, Note, Advisers, Brokers, and Online Platforms: How a Uniform Fiduciary Duty Will Better Serve Investors, 2017 Colum. Bus. L. Rev. 1200.

March 21, 2018 | Permalink | Comments (0)

Thursday, March 8, 2018

New Securities Law Articles in Print

The following law review articles relating to securities regulation are now available in paper format:

Eric C. Chaffee, Securities Regulation in Virtual Space, 74 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 1387 (2017).

Ronnie Cohen & Gabriele Lingenfelter, Money Isn't Everything: Why Public Benefit Corporations Should Be Required to Disclose Non-Financial Information, 42 Del. J. Corp. L. 115 (2017).

Jill E. Fisch, Standing Voting Instructions: Empowering the Excluded Retail Investor, 102 Minn. L. Rev. 11 (2017).

David F. Freeman Jr., U.S. Financial Regulation of Sovereign Wealth Funds, 52 Wake Forest L. Rev. 781 (2017).

Enrico Ginevra & Chiara Presciani, Sovereign Wealth Fund Transparency and the European Rules on Institutional Investor Disclosure, 52 Wake Forest L. Rev. 815 (2017).

Anita K. Krug, The Other Securities Regulator: A Case Study in Regulatory Damage, 92 Tul. L. Rev. 339 (2017).

John Lightbourne, Note, Algorithms & Fiduciaries: Existing and Proposed Regulatory Approaches to Artificially Intelligent Financial Planners, 67 Duke L.J. 651 (2017).

Kendall R. Pauley, Comment, Why Salman Is a Game-Changer for the Political Intelligence Industry, 67 Am. U. L. Rev. 603 (2017).

Lesesne Phillips, Note, If It Quacks Like a Duck: The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority and Federal Jurisdiction, 74 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 1695 (2017).

David Rosenfeld, Admissions in SEC Enforcement Cases: The Revolution That Wasn't, 103 Iowa L. Rev. 113 (2017).

What Happens in the Dark: An Exploration of Dark Pools and High Frequency Trading, Articles by Jonathan Macey, David Swensen, Merritt B. Fox, Gabriel Rauterberg, Kevin S. Haeberle & Kristin N. Johnson, 42 J. Corp. L. 777-915 (2017).

March 8, 2018 | Permalink | Comments (0)