Securities Law Prof Blog

Editor: Eric C. Chaffee
Univ. of Toledo College of Law

Tuesday, May 29, 2007

SEC Urged to Take Pro-Investor Position in Supreme Court Cases

Next term the Supreme Court will hear argument, in the Charter Communications case, whether third parties can be liable as primary violators by participating in a scheme to defraud under Rule 10b-5(2), or or they simply aiders and abetters whom private parties cannot sue under Central Banks. Plaintiffs in a similar suit charging the investment banks involved in some Enron financings with fraud have asked the Supreme Court to take up their case as well.  In the past few weeks William Lerach, attorney for the plaintiffs in the Enron case, and others have waged an intense lobbying campaign to persuade the SEC to file an amicus brief on the side of the investors.  The SEC supported imposing scheme liability on the bankers at the district court level in the the Enron case, but the agency has taken positions contrary to private plaintiffs in Supreme Court amicus briefs in several major recent Supreme Court cases, including Tellabs. See WSJ, SEC's Allegiances Are Put to Test

News Stories | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference SEC Urged to Take Pro-Investor Position in Supreme Court Cases:

» Round-Up: Other News from SCOTUSblog
In yesterday's New York Times, Linda Greenhouse's latest "Supreme Court Memo" column, available here, discussed statutory cases before the Supreme Court, Hackworth v. Progressive Casualty Insurance Company (a particular statutory case involving the Fam... [Read More]

Tracked on May 29, 2007 2:03:49 PM


Post a comment