Thursday, February 12, 2015

Cook and Dickens on Types of Consent in Reproductive Health Care

Rebecca J. Cook (University of Toronto) and Bernard M. Dickens (University of Toronto) have posted Types of Consent in Reproductive Health Care on SSRN. Here is the abstract:

Healthcare providers require prior consent to treat patients. Consent can be different for legal purposes, and be expressed in different ways. Simple consent affords providers protection from liability for assault, but negligence can arise if the consent is inadequately informed. 

Bernard Dickens Rebecca CookProviders cannot coerce or improperly induce consent; patients’ agreement that a provider wrongly influences is compliance, not true consent. Attempts to rescue patients in peril may be lawful on the presumption of their implied consent, unless patients negate the presumption. In special cases, laws may require that consent be written, but generally consent can be given by speech or conduct. Informed consent depends on patients’ comprehension, but consent for treatment of uncomprehending patients may come from third parties, including legally recognized substitutes or judges. There may be legal limits to reproductive procedures to which patients may consent, under laws that can be respectfully tested, but have to be obeyed.

https://lawprofessors.typepad.com/reproductive_rights/2015/02/rebecca-j-cookuniversity-of-toronto-andbernard-m-dickensuniversity-of-toronto-have-publishedtypes-of-consent-in-repro.html

Scholarship and Research | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

https://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef01b8d0d48cb3970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Cook and Dickens on Types of Consent in Reproductive Health Care:

Comments