Sunday, March 30, 2014

Ninth Circuit Case Addresses Constitutionality of Requiring Porn Actors to Wear Condoms

The National Law Journal: A Condom Conundrum: Can Los Angeles demand that porn actors wear them?, by Amanda Bronstad:

At first blush, a case now before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit appears downright raunchy, brought by a Los Angeles studio whose films have titles like "Bedside Brat," and "Sex in Dangerous Places."

But the appeal, by Vivid Entertain­ment LLC, raises an intriguing constitutional issue: How far does the First Amendment go in protecting the free-speech rights of actors who have sex with each other in movies? . . .

https://lawprofessors.typepad.com/reproductive_rights/2014/03/ninth-circuit-case-addresses-constitutionality-of-requiring-porn-actors-to-wear-condoms.html

Film, In the Courts, Sexually Transmitted Disease | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

https://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef01a73d9db706970d

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Ninth Circuit Case Addresses Constitutionality of Requiring Porn Actors to Wear Condoms:

Comments

Post a comment