Monday, October 15, 2012

NYT Editorial on Romney and a Future Without Roe v. Wade

The New York Times editorial: If Roe v. Wade Goes:  

It is no secret that Mitt Romney and his running-mate, Representative Paul Ryan, are opponents of abortion rights. When Mr. Ryan was asked at last week’s debate whether voters who support abortion rights should be worried if the Romney-Ryan ticket were elected, he essentially said yes.

They would depart slightly from the extremist Republican Party platform by allowing narrow exceptions for rape, incest or the life of the woman. Beyond that, they would move to take away a fundamental right that American women have had for nearly 40 years. . . .

https://lawprofessors.typepad.com/reproductive_rights/2012/10/nyts-editorial-on-future-of-roe-v-wade.html

2012 Presidential Campaign, Abortion, Abortion Bans, Reproductive Health & Safety, Supreme Court | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

https://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef017c328e28f2970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference NYT Editorial on Romney and a Future Without Roe v. Wade:

Comments

Post a comment