Wednesday, August 22, 2012

More on the Inconsistency Between Fetal Personhood and Rape Exceptions for Abortion

The Washington Post (op-ed column): On abortion, a matter of exception, by Ruth Marcus:

There’s something off — something a bit cowardly, actually — about the positions of both parties in the abortion debate refueled by the asinine remarks of Rep. Todd Akin (R-Mo.).

Akin’s comments have left Republicans scrambling to avoid the politically unpalatable implications of the anti-abortion views central to their party. Democrats, meanwhile, are delighted to focus on a tiny subset of abortion exceptions — even as they shy away from standing up for the broader principle that women get to decide whether to continue an unwanted pregnancy, no matter how it happened. . . .

https://lawprofessors.typepad.com/reproductive_rights/2012/08/more-opinion-on-the-inconsistency-between-fetal-personhood-and-rape-exceptions-for-abortion.html

Abortion, Abortion Bans, Fetal Rights, Politics, Sexual Assault | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

https://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef0177444a60fd970d

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference More on the Inconsistency Between Fetal Personhood and Rape Exceptions for Abortion:

Comments

Post a comment