Friday, September 9, 2011

New York Times Editorial on Effort to Free Up Foreign Aid for Rape Victims' Abortions

New York Times editorial: Humanitarian Aid for Rape Victims:

On his third day in office, President Obama issued an executive order lifting the odious “global gag rule” that denied federal money for family planning work abroad to any group that performed abortions or counseled about the procedure, even with its own money. But he left standing another policy that imposes similar speech restrictions and bans using foreign aid money for abortions — even to save a woman’s life or in cases of rape in war zones like Congo, Sudan and Burma.

The policy is not mandated by any law. Rather, it is an overly restrictive interpretation of the Helms amendment, which was originally enacted in 1973 and bars using foreign aid money to “pay for the performance of abortion as a method of family planning or to motivate or coerce any person to practice abortions.” . . .

https://lawprofessors.typepad.com/reproductive_rights/2011/09/new-york-times-editorial-on-human-rights-groups-strives-to-get-helm-amendment-reinterpreted.html

Abortion, Congress, International, Poverty, President/Executive Branch, Reproductive Health & Safety, Sexual Assault | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

https://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef0153916cc8ed970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference New York Times Editorial on Effort to Free Up Foreign Aid for Rape Victims' Abortions:

Comments

Post a comment