Thursday, March 8, 2007
Consensual Incest and Abortion
Patrick, who is 30 years old, was adopted and, as a child, he lived in Potsdam.
He did not meet his mother and biological family until he was 23. He travelled to Leipzig with a friend in 2000, determined to make contact with his other relatives.
He met his sister Susan for the first time, and according to the couple, after their mother died, they fell in love....
Patrick and Susan have been living together for the last six years, and they now have four children.
The authorities placed their first son, Eric, in the care of a foster family, and two other children were also placed in care....
Incest is a criminal offence in Germany. Patrick Stuebing has already served a two-year sentence for committing incest and there is another jail term looming if paragraph 173 of the legal code is not overturned.
The couple's lawyer, Endrik Wilhelm, has lodged an appeal with Germany's highest judicial body, the federal Constitutional Court in Karlsruhe, in order to overturn the country's ban on incest.
See also Siblings fight Germany's incest law (United Press International); German Incest Convict to Take Case to Highest Court (Deutsche Welle).
Many anti-choice people think abortion should be permitted in cases of incest. Most lump this together with rape as in, "I favor exceptions for rape and incest," appearing to view the two acts as falling within the same general classification. One reason may be that they view both situations as ones in which the woman is not morally culpable for the procreative act. But that would imply nonconsensual incest, which doesn't seem to apply to this German couple. So would they favor an abortion in this context too?
Either way, the position seems to be less about protecting "unborn life" as much as it is about either punishing (or forgiving) the woman in the procreative act (consensual intercourse vs. rape or nonconsensual incest) or about revulsion regarding the procreative act. It presumably is not a concern for avoiding the birth of children with disabilities, for most anti-choice advocates oppose abortion for reasons of fetal anomaly. Is there a consistent moral justification that explains an exception for consensual incest?
"Patrick and Susan have been living together for the last six years, and they now have four children."
This couple must be allowed to keep their family alive. It is a very sensitive issue in terms of human rights and psychological point of view too. They are not wrong! They are not criminals! They didnot harm anyone here! Let them live together as long as they as they are happy to be a loving family with their own kids. PLEASE DON'T DESTROY THIS HAPPY AND LOVING FAMILY. LET THEM LIVE, PLEASE!
Yes, I fully agree with the idea that the paragraph 173 of the legal code MUST BE OVERTURNED. Long live human rights organizations and Endrik Wilhelm,the couple's lawyer. May God Bless you all concerned to this case.
With love and regards,
Posted by: Prajna Bhumianand | Apr 19, 2007 1:04:44 AM