Friday, November 23, 2012

Tarrant on Obligations as Property

TarrantJohn Tarrant (Western Australia) has posted Obligations as Property (University of New South Wales Law Journal) on SSRN.  Here's the abstract:

A widely asserted proposition is that all property rights are rights in rem and that rights in personam, such as debts and bank accounts, are not property rights. The proposition was advocated by John Austin based on his interpretation of Roman law. The obvious difficulty with the proposition is that it is irreconcilable with the case law because a number of cases from ultimate appellant courts confirm that debts are property rights. The author examines relevant case law and interpretations of Roman law to argue that the proposition that all property rights are rights in rem is based on a misunderstanding of Roman law. The author concludes that the assertion should be rejected as erroneous. Debts in the form of money obligations owed by one person to another are indeed property rights.

Steve Clowney

| Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Tarrant on Obligations as Property :


Thanks for the help. Keep up the good work Steve!

Posted by: Alex Beeman | Jan 22, 2013 8:55:36 AM

Post a comment