Friday, December 17, 2010
Over at PrawfsBlawg, Rick Hills has a post outlining Governor Christie's attack on the Mt. Laurel doctrine. Hills then discusses why Republicans, who otherwise endorse private property, love local zoning rules. Hills says:
I think that there are two ways to understand this odd conservative solicitude for suburban zoning. . . . First, race and class might take priority over property rights in conservative ideology. Libertarian rhetoric against intrusive government is just fine -- but not when it allows low- and moderate-income housing to invade your suburban enclave. Second, hostility to redistribution of wealth might trump hostility to regulation in conservative ideology. By insuring that each resident live in a structure of similar value, restrictive zoning insures that each resident pays a similar property tax bill, thereby transforming ad valorem property taxes into an annual fee reflecting the average costs of living in the jurisdiction.
A thoughtful, well-argued post.
[Comments are held for approval, so there will be some delay in posting]