Friday, January 30, 2009

LaCroix on Land Use and Climate Change

Catherine J. LaCroix (Case Western) has posted Land Use and Climate Change: Is it Time for a National Land Use Policy? on SSRN.  Here's the abstract:

During the past few years it has become apparent that the challenge of climate change requires us to rethink fundamental aspects of the way we live. Already we have focused on the power industry, the way we fuel our cars, and the extent to which we may conserve power through green buildings and more efficient lighting. This opinion piece asks us to consider another step in the process: the development of a national land use policy to restrict sprawl and encourage more energy-efficient land use patterns. Traditional land use policy is based on Euclidean zoning that separates land uses and encourages sprawl. Land use regulation is fragmented in the hands of thousands of local governments. The American Planning Association has argued that the division of metropolitan areas into individual autonomous regulatory kingdoms defeats rational planning and leads to sprawl, traffic congestion, and environmental degradation. Once land is developed along low-density suburban patterns, reliance on mass transportation is doomed and auto dependency is guaranteed. The paper suggests that we consider development of a national land use policy that sets goals or perhaps standards and guidelines for smart growth programs nationwide, with federal funding for states that choose to abide by these prescriptions.

Ben Barros

[Comments are held for approval, so there will be some delay in posting]

https://lawprofessors.typepad.com/property/2009/01/lacroix-on-land.html

Land Use, Recent Scholarship | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

https://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef010536fac45c970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference LaCroix on Land Use and Climate Change:

Comments

I could (and others have) make the same exact arguments for reducing sprawl, without resort to motivation of ameliorating the effects of global climate change. Unfortunately, this author, like legions of other gullible, march-in-step laymen, can't resist the urge to profess the given and dire absolute truth of 'climate change.'

I do not disagree that sprawl is hideous. On the other hand, to some extent, this country tried to have high-density mixed use areas--they were known as BIG CITIES! Result???

Let's stop this non-sense of linking every single action that takes place the world over, with immediate deleterious effects on 'climate.'

And once again, one notes that the same old ill-conceived solutions are suggested: let the government fix it; let the government mandate it; let the government dangle the carrot of 'federal funds to the states'.

Does the madness ever cease?

Posted by: sam gompers | Jan 30, 2009 9:13:33 AM

Post a comment