M & A Law Prof Blog

Editor: Brian JM Quinn
Boston College Law School

Monday, August 22, 2011

Adams on the Google-Motorola agreement

Drafting guru Ken Adams has taken a look a the Google-Motorola agreement and shares his thoughts:

So, what do I think of the Google–Motorola merger agreement? It’s a mediocre piece of drafting. It’s bloated and hard to read, and that takes a toll at every stage—drafting, reviewing, negotiating, and monitoring compliance. And there might be lurking in the verbiage some bit of confusion that metastasizes into a dispute down the road.

Mediocre? How can that be! After all, Google is represented by the prominent law firm Cleary Gottlieb—presumably they did the bulk of the drafting. Well, the Google–Motorola merger agreement is mediocre because all big-time M&A drafting—or at least all that I’ve seen—is mediocre.

True enough.  Imagine if Mark Twain tried to write The Adventures of Tom Sawyer by committee and using The Adventures of Hucklebery Finn as a template for the first draft?  Wouldn't be much of a book, that's for sure.  Ken offers up his thoughts on improving the drafting process - including commoditizing the process. 



| Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:


Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Adams on the Google-Motorola agreement:


Brian, interested to hear whether you agree or disagree. Most of these points seem pretty inconsequential, as noted in the comments / discussion to Ken's original post. It would a pretty brave mid level associate that thought it was worth bringing these things up with a partner.

Posted by: Anon | Aug 23, 2011 6:35:33 PM

Post a comment