Media Law Prof Blog

Editor: Christine A. Corcos
Louisiana State Univ.

Tuesday, March 17, 2015

Australia's Shield Laws and the Courts

Hannah Ryan, University of Sydney, has published The Half-Hearted Protection of Journalists’ Sources: Judicial Interpretation of Australia’s Shield Laws at 19 Media and Arts Law Review 325 (2014). Here is the abstract.

Since 2011, several Australian jurisdictions have introduced ‘shield laws’ featuring a rebuttable presumption that journalists will not be compellable to give evidence that would disclose the identity of a confidential source. The first relevant case decided under these laws suggested that they will be more favourable to journalists than previous common law and statutory positions. However, celebration is premature. Australian judges have always been reluctant to exempt journalists from compelled disclosure of their sources, despite the fundamental ethical obligation journalists have to keep source identity and information confidential. Courts have only slowly and hesitantly recognised a public interest supporting that obligation. One important reason is that, unlike European and English courts, Australian courts have failed to consider the free speech implications of disclosure. As long as this judicial predisposition persists, Australian shield laws may provide only a weak protection for journalists.

Download the article from SSRN at the link.

| Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Australia's Shield Laws and the Courts: