Media Law Prof Blog

Editor: Christine A. Corcos
Louisiana State Univ.

Monday, January 9, 2012

Analyzing the Citizens United Decision

Randall P. Bezanson, University of Iowa College of Law, is publishing No Middle Ground? Reflections on the Citizens United Decision in the Iowa Law Review. Here is the abstract.

My interest in this brief essay is to explore precisely what the Court decided in Citizen’s United and the constitutional basis upon which the decision rests. I will turn first to the Kennedy opinion, its broad holding that corporations are first amendment speakers, its logical consequences, and the analytical problems under the First Amendment and Supreme Court doctrine that Kennedy basically ignored. I will then turn to the Scalia opinion and its significance for first amendment theory and doctrine. Finally, I will make the claim that Justice Scalia’s opinion is, for analytical purposes, the governing opinion. At least this is so on all of the “holdings” in the Court’s opinion that Justice Kennedy’s style of decision unnecessarily (in terms of Justice Scalia’s reasoning) reached out to announce. These broad holdings are the very basis upon which the controversy about the decision has rested.

Download the article from SSRN at the link.

| Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Analyzing the Citizens United Decision: