Tuesday, March 11, 2014
"What Makes Lawyers Happy? Transcending the Anecdotes with Data from 6200 Lawyers"
This is a draft of a new article by Professors Larry Krieger (Florida State) and Kennon Sheldon (Missouri - Dept. of Psychological Sciences) available on SSRN here. One of the interesting conclusions drawn by the authors is that public interest lawyers, the group they studied who had with the lowest income, reported being happier than those in the most "prestigious" positions with the highest income levels.
From the abstract:
Attorney well-being and depression are topics of great concern, but there has been no theory-driven empirical research to guide lawyers and law students seeking well-being. This article reports a unique study establishing a hierarchy of five tiers of factors for lawyer well-being, including choices in law school, legal career, and personal life, and psychological needs and motivations established by Self-Determination Theory. Data from several thousand lawyers in four states show striking patterns, repeatedly indicating that common priorities on law school campuses and among lawyers are confused or misplaced. Factors typically afforded most attention and concern, those relating to prestige and money (income, law school debt, class rank, law review, and USNWR law school ranking) showed zero to small correlations with lawyer well-being. Conversely, factors marginalized in law school and seen in previous research to erode in law students (psychological needs and motivation) were the very strongest predictors of lawyer happiness and satisfaction. Lawyers were grouped by practice type and setting to further test these findings. The group with the lowest incomes and grades in law school, public service lawyers, had stronger autonomy and purpose and were happier than those in the most prestigious positions and with the highest grades and incomes. Additional measures raised concerns: subjects did not broadly agree that judge and lawyer behavior is professional, nor that the legal process reaches fair outcomes. Specific explanations and recommendations for lawyers, law teachers, and legal employers are drawn from the data, and direct implications for attorney productivity and professionalism are explained.
(jbl).
https://lawprofessors.typepad.com/legal_skills/2014/03/what-makes-lawyers-happy-transcending-the-anecdotes-with-data-from-6200-lawyers.html