Sunday, October 31, 2010
Student authored law review comment argues for 4th year of law school to incorporate more skills training while helping the poor
Here's a law review comment written by a student at Florida Coastal School of Law entitled "Upholding the oath of competency while filling the indigent void: why the law school curriculum should be extended to a fourth year." From the introduction:
By all accounts, the current economic outlook for law students entering the job market is bleak. Some law students who cannot find jobs have been forced to take temporary work paying a mere twenty dollars an hour. In the midst of the current economic crisis, this country’s most prominent firms are hiring approximately half as many students as they did during the previous year. In the past, approximately two-thirds of law school graduates secured jobs prior to graduation; however, many of the 2009 graduates were without jobs just prior to receiving their diplomas. This is perhaps “the worst attorney job market in years.” The scariest part of this bleak legal job market is that if law students are not able to find employment with firms that will teach them how to practice law, they will have to hang their shingle and go it alone, severely unprepared. In essence, a newly licensed attorney can begin to do legal work on behalf of a client without ever spending a day in a law office, without ever talking to a client, or without even drafting a single genuine legal document. Perhaps this is the reason that solo practitioners and firms of five attorneys or less have the highest incidence of legal malpractice claims. Currently, law schools are not preparing students with the practical skills needed for success after graduation, leaving students in a potentially career ending situation if they cannot find an experienced lawyer to adequately train them to be successful attorneys The legal profession should demand more.
A Connecticut law firm has taken office space in the former home of a fast food restaurant and is taking full advantage of the drive-thru window feature. As our sister publication the Law Librarian Blogf reports:
The Kocian Law Group has taken over a former fast food joint for a branch office of sorts. Clients can pick up and deliver documents via the drive-thru window staffed by a paralegal who is also available to answer some questions. While the media is having fun with this story . . . the firm makes a good point for explaining why. "We represent a lot of injured people," [Nick] Kocian said. 'If you have somebody who's in a wheelchair or somebody who's hurt, it's convenient.' Quoting from this NBC story which includes a video.
Hat tip to Joe Hodnicki.
Thanks to Above the Law for tipping me off to this newsletter published by San Francisco's MoFo that covers social media and the law. Called "Socially Aware," here's a link to the current newsletter which includes brief articles on the discovery of communications through social media sites and Facebook liability for the unauthorized use of minors' names and likenesses. And here's a link where you can access previous editions (by scrolling down the page).
What is LPM, why is it important and should those teaching law office management courses include it?
LPM stands for Legal Project Management and it's the hot topic lately among practitioners hoping to control legal fees in order to appease clients. As reported at the law.com blog:
LPM is the hot topic right now, sweeping through the collective consciousness of both law firm lawyers and in-house counsel like wildfire. This viral vogue is the result of dramatic changes in legal service delivery that place an unprecedented premium on improving the efficiency, predictability, and cost management of legal services.
. . . .
LPM is a logical sequence of activities in which law firm and client agree on goals and the value of service and then create clear and consistent process pathways to get stuff done on time and on budget. In all LPM models, we see a common series of steps:
1. scoping the engagement (with the client, please);
2. identifying resources and constraints;
3. building an action plan that guides all team members;
4. implementing the plan;
5. monitoring and fine tuning; and
6. after-project review, to see how everybody did and what could be done better next time.
In other words, amid all the bells and whistles, LPM is structured common sense. LPM aims to rebut lawyers' natural tendency to dive in and get rolling whenever a new engagement arises. LPM says, in effect, 'Whoa, slow down. Let's front-end-load the planning process, so that we stay in better control of downstream implementation.'
If any of our readers are teaching this in an law practice management course, please let us know in the comments below.
Imagine a new mom losing her child because she ate a poppy seed bagel before giving birth. That’s what happened to a mom in New Castle, PA, when the seeds caused a false positive and led the county children and youth services agency to seize the new born without a hearing. According to the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, mom and dad are suing with the assistance of the ACLU. Another issue of which lawyers should be cognizant.
Saturday, October 30, 2010
Here's a little Halloween "treat" for all our readers - Screamin' Jay Hawkins performing the holiday-appropriate "I Put A Spell on You." This abbreviated live version comes with all the bells and whistles - Screamin' Jay emerging from his coffin, flash paper pyrotechnics and his trusty companion Henry (a skull on a stick).
Legend has it that Jalacy Hawkins, a trained operatic singer, had to get completely inebriated before he was able to lose enough inhibition to properly record the song. Initially considered too raw and full of sexual innuendo for radio play, it is now considered one of the best rock and roll tracks ever recorded. Enjoy and have a Happy Halloween!
From the Legal Blog Watch:
1. The iPad is beginning to displace the traditional laptop, particularly among those who use a laptop primarily for email and web-based communications.
Tablet Legal writes that there is not much evidence that this is similarly occurring in the legal world so far, which is 'surprising considering the typical short list of lawyer computing needs: reading, writing, email, calendar, contacts, internet. All of these are handled well by the iPad.'
2. The iPad is replacing paper. Forrester found that 'wherever people would usually carry around stacks of paper or files, particularly in medical and pharmaceutical industries, the iPad is now the preferred choice.'
Tablet Legal writes that this trend also does not seem to have taken hold in the legal world. Many lawyers still 'feel they can only edit or review a document in its printed form,' TL writes, also noting that the move to abandon paper may begin to grow with the next generation of legal professionals.Tablet Legal says this is strike three for lawyers, who have not really begun to do anything similar for their clients.
3. The iPad is allowing companies to be more efficient, Forrester says, 'by providing immediate connection to further resources and data.' For example, a sales rep may use the iPad to customize a customer’s order on the showroom floor.
You can read the rest here.
In the Texas Lawyer, attorney Kip Mendrygal offers two suggestions on how to act like a lawyer on Halloween. (1) Mediate the neighborhood candy swap. (2) Enforce the law—“Excuse me Scary Dragon, use the crosswalk” “Look Strawberry Shortcake, ‘one piece’ means ‘one piece.” In the words of Carl Sandberg, “Why does a hearse horse snicker hauling a lawyer away?”
Only 646 faculty, lawyers, and judges responded to the latest U.S. News survey that helps determine law school rankings. So reports Gary Greener, Associate Dean for Career Services at Southwestern Law School, in the NALP Bulletin (Oct. 2010) (National Association of Legal Career Professionals). These individuals ranked each law school on a scale of 1 to 5. The results of these rankings account for 40 percent of the U.S. News ranking results. 646 lawyers comprise less than 1/20 of one percent of all the lawyers in the country.
This information previously was noted on the Law Librarian Blog.
(Thnx to Anne Rector, Emory)
Friday, October 29, 2010
Here are the details:
Georgetown University Law Center is seeking to hire a Externship Director. We are looking for a person with both administrative and teaching skills who can build and grow an excellent program. The Externship Director will be responsible for all aspects of the program, including: assisting students in finding appropriate placements; ensuring the quality of student placements; designing and teaching "bookend" classes at the beginning and end of the semester in which students define their learning goals and then reflect on whether they have achieved them; and holding individual student reflection sessions throughout the semester. The Externship Director will be supervised by the Associate Dean for Clinical Programs and Experiential Learning; because this is not a faculty position, there is no scholarship requirement. Teaching experience and familiarity with public interest, non-profit and/or governmental entities are desirable.
When the Arthur Anderson accounting firm showed the Enron Board of Directors accounting board powerpoints that gently warned of sketchy accounting practices, did the lack of a bold warning doom Enron? Did a confusing powerpoint –driven presentation by Boeing engineers contribute to the 2003 Columbia space shuttle disaster? These are the questions that Nancy Duarte raises in her CNN.com article, “Why We Hate PowerPoints—and how to fix them.”
Congratulations to John Gotanda, who transitions from Associate Dean to Dean at Villanova University Law School. Most recently, Gotanda led the successful effort to provide that every 1L student have one course (Property or Contracts) that includes one credit hour of practicum. The practicum is in addition to the Legal Writing course.
Thursday, October 28, 2010
As reported below, students overwhelmingly prefer hardcopy textbooks to electronic copies. Nicholas Carr, author of "The Shallows: What the Internet is Doing to Our Brains," makes a compelling argument that hardcopy textbooks promote better learning than their electronic counterparts. Nevertheless, the Chronicle of Higher Ed is reporting that pressure from college administrators to control costs may result in students being required to purchase e-textbooks as part of an electronic course packet.
For years observers have predicted a coming wave of e-textbooks. But so far it just hasn't happened. One explanation for the delay is that while music fans were eager to try a new, more portable form of entertainment, students tend to be more conservative when choosing required materials for their studies. For a real disruption in the textbook market, students may have to be forced to change.
That's exactly what some companies and college leaders are now proposing. They're saying that e-textbooks should be required reading and that colleges should be the ones charging for them. It is the best way to control skyrocketing costs and may actually save the textbook industry from digital piracy, they claim. Major players like the McGraw-Hill Companies, Pearson, and John Wiley & Sons are getting involved.
You can read more about the reasons behind the big push for e-textbooks here. And for an interesting historical perspective on the role administrators, rather than teachers (or students, for that matter), have played in the push to introduce technology into the classroom, check out "Teachers and Machines: The Classroom Use of Technology Since 1920."
"You talkin' to me?"
"Go ahead, make my day!"
"I'm mad as hell and I'm not going to take it anymore!"
"Hitler... there was a painter! He could paint an entire apartment in ONE afternoon! TWO coats!"
"Frankly, my dear, I don't give a damn."
"I can get you a toe, dude. There are ways."
This New York Times editorial asks where have all the great, or at least memorable, movie lines gone? Blame it on the internet.
Sticky movie lines were everywhere as recently as the 1990s. But they appear to be evaporating from a film world in which the memorable one-liner — a brilliant epigram, a quirky mantra, a moment in a bottle — is in danger of becoming a lost art.
. . . .
Maybe it’s that filmmaking is more visual, or that other cultural noise is drowning out the zingers.
“I’m at a loss, because the lines for a while were coming fast and furious,” said Laurence Mark, who had us at “hello” as a producer of “Jerry Maguire,” and is a producer of “How Do You Know,” which is written and directed by James L. Brooks and scheduled to open just before Christmas. (In 1987 Mr. Brooks mapped the media future in seven words from “Broadcast News”: “Let’s never forget, we’re the real story.”)
If film lines don’t stick the way they used to, Mr. Mark said, it is not for lack of wit and wisdom in Hollywood. “What I don’t believe is that the writers are less talented,” he insisted. “I don’t think that’s true, I just don’t.”
Speaking by phone recently, however, Mr. Mark was hard-pressed to come up with a line that stuck with him in the last few years. “I will try my darnedest to think of one,” he promised.
It may be that a Web-driven culture of irony latches onto the movie lines for something other than brilliance, or is downright allergic to the kind of polish that was once applied to the best bits of dialogue.
You can read the rest here.
An attorney filed a 465 page complaint (including an 8 page title!) in a Washington state federal district court against defendant GMAC Mortgage, et al. whom, not surprisingly, responded with a Motion for a More Definite Statement. In support of his order granting defendants' motion, Judge Leighton cited to Shakespeare for the proposition that "brevity is [not only] the soul of wit," it's also the soul of effective pleading. The judge recommended that plaintiff's counsel read Bryan Garner's "The Elements of Legal Style." Finally, the judge ended his order with the following rhyme:
Plaintiff has a great deal to say,
But it seems he skipped Rule 8(a),
His Complaint is too long,
Which renders it wrong,
Please re-write and re-file today.
If you ask me, the plaintiff's attorney got off easy.
You can read Judge Leighton's full order here.
Thanks to legajuice.com and a big hat tip to Rob Hudson, librarian extraordinaire.
If you recently tried to subscribe to this blog but were unable to, I believe the problem is now fixed. (Thanks to Dennis Kennedy, Simon Fodden at www.slaw.ca and Joe Hodnicki). Scroll down the page and look in the left-hand margin for the subscription button. If you still experience a problem subscribing, let me know and I'll get it fixed.
Thanks for your support.
A recent article by Marisa Cianciarulo and Claudia David demonstrates how clinical work and practical expertise can contribute to developing law reform. The article is “Pulling the Trigger: Separation Violence as a Basis for Refugee Protection for Battered Women,” 59 American University Law Review 337 (2009). Here’s the abstract:
For over a decade, women seeking asylum from persecution inflicted by their abusive husbands and partners have found little protection in the United States. During that time, domestic violence-based asylum cases have languished in limbo, been denied, or occasionally been granted in unpublished opinions that have not provided a much-needed adjudicative standard. The main case setting forth the pre-Obama approach to domestic violence-based asylum is rife with misunderstanding of the nature of domestic violence and minimization of the role that society plays in the proliferation of domestic violence. Fortunately, however, a recent Obama-administration legal brief indicates that women fleeing countries where governments are unable or unwilling to protect them from their abusive husbands finally may be able to avail themselves of U.S. asylum law. This article proposes a workable standard for adjudicating such claims. Based in part on psychological research on the dynamics of abusive relationships, particularly the phenomenon known as “separation violence,” this article formulates a particular social group that satisfies the various legal elements for political asylum: “women who have left severely abusive relationships.” This social group is based on research demonstrating that abusers strike out with increased violence when their partners leave the relationships, in many cases even killing them. This article explores the dynamics of abusive relationships, the failure of U.S. adjudicators to understand those dynamics, and the application of international human rights law to domestic violence survivors.
Professor Cianciarulo conducts the Family Violence Clinic at the Chapman University School of Law and has an extensive background in the immigration field. Dr. David is a practicing psychologist specializing in abusive relationships. Their experience has permitted them to make a real contribution that may help refugees from domestic violence.
Wednesday, October 27, 2010
Please allow me to introduce myself with my first post as a contributing editor on the Legal Skills Prof Blog. I’m Dennis Kennedy and I’m an information technology lawyer, legal technology author, blogger and podcaster who has been writing about the application of technology to the practice of law for many years. Among other things, I currently write the technology column for the ABA Journal.
There’s never been more discussion of or greater interest in the role that practical skills training should play in legal education than there is today. I’m so pleased to be part of the Legal Skills Prof Blog team because I believe this blog will become a focal point and a platform for conversation about this topic as well as a way to highlight developments and provide models for action.
In my last year of law school, I realized one day that I was learning much more about bankruptcy law in my part-time job at a law firm than I was learning about the day-to-day aspects of bankruptcy practice in my bankruptcy law class. That’s a common feeling among those who work part-time during law school.
I co-taught a class in Intellectual Property Drafting as an adjunct professor at the Washington University Law School several years ago. Some of the best response I received was to the time I took at the end of a couple of classes to talk about how the students might actually go about completing a drafting project at a firm – use of forms and templates, et al.
For the last few summers, I’ve been a guest speaker for a law practice management class at St. Louis University Law School. I focus on using technology in the practice. I’ve simply done a Q & A session and, to my surprise, we’ve never even come close to running out of questions to talk about.
My “beat” on this blog will, not surprisingly, given my long history of writing and speaking about legal technology, focus on technology aspects of law practice and legal education, and ways we can teach and, most importantly, learn about technology. Ideally, we can all learn from each other.
I’ll admit to being a technology advocate. I can assure you that you won’t ever see my advocating a prohibition on the use of laptop computers in the classroom.
Please join us in this blog conversation and experiment, which is so well summed-up by the “mission statement” of this blog:
What we hope to accomplish with this blog is to fill a niche that we think is currently missing in the legal blogosphere; creating a forum for news and discussion between and among law professors who teach legal skills (including legal writing professors, clinicians and "doctrinal" professors who incorporate practical skills into their courses), practitioners who hire the students we teach, and student themselves who are interested in keeping abreast of trends in legal skills training.