Wednesday, August 14, 2024

Forlorn Hope

An attorney's resignation has been accepted by the New York Appellate Division for the Second Judicial Department

The respondent acknowledges in his affidavit that he is currently the subject of three complaints being investigated bythe Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District, involving allegations that he engaged in the unauthorized practice of law during a period of time when he was suspended from the practice of law and the misappropriation of client funds in relation to his representation of the Estate of Leonor Carvajal. The respondent attests that he cannot successfully defend himself against the allegations based upon the facts and circumstances of his professional misconduct.

Effect

Inasmuch as the respondent’s application to resign complies with the requirements of 22 NYCRR 1240.10, the application is granted and, effective immediately, the respondent is disbarred and his name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law.

ABA Journal reported on the earlier suspension

A lawyer who made personal cash withdrawals from his lawyer trust account with an ATM card has been suspended for three years.

The Appellate Division’s Second Judicial Department of the New York State Supreme Court suspended lawyer Stewart David Pollak of Melville, New York, in a Feb. 13 opinionBloomberg Law reports.

The court concluded that Pollak’s mistakes were likely caused by “willful ignorance” rather than health conditions he cited as a mitigating factor in his conduct.

The appeals court said that, beginning in April 2014, Pollak made a series of withdrawals from the trust account, which had held escrow funds for a client. Thirty cash withdrawals totaling $18,700 were made with an ATM card. Other withdrawals totaling more than $45,000 were made by check.

Pollak deposited more than $80,000 to replenish the account in September 2016.

Pollak also deposited legal fees into the trust account, which amounted to an improper commingling of funds, the court said.

Pollak had told ethics regulators that he was unaware that his bank had linked his escrow account to the debit card, and his mistakes were unintentional. He also said he had diabetes and depression, although he didn’t know it at the time, and the conditions contributed to his inability to recognize his mistakes.

The appeals court said despite those factors and Pollak’s expressions of remorse, the suspension was warranted.

Pollak’s “diabetic condition cannot reasonably account for the lack of attention and oversight over his bank accounts over an extended two-year period,” the appeals court said. “Assuming that the respondent truly did not know that he was invading funds that he knew were ‘not to be touched,’ willful ignorance, rather than uncontrolled diabetes, is the more plausible explanation for the respondent’s use of escrow funds for personal expenses.

 

The appeals court said despite those factors and Pollak’s expressions of remorse, the suspension was warranted.

Pollak’s “diabetic condition cannot reasonably account for the lack of attention and oversight over his bank accounts over an extended two-year period,” the appeals court said. “Assuming that the respondent truly did not know that he was invading funds that he knew were ‘not to be touched,’ willful ignorance, rather than uncontrolled diabetes, is the more plausible explanation for the respondent’s use of escrow funds for personal expenses.”

The court also noted that Pollak had been admonished in 2018 for fabricating a judicial decree. He also received two letters of advisement in 2017 for failing to keep clients reasonably informed about the status of legal matters.

Pollak commented on the decision in a brief interview with the ABA Journal.

“I am sorry it happened, and I am embarrassed by it, and I hope to do better,” he says.

(Mike Frisch)

https://lawprofessors.typepad.com/legal_profession/2024/08/forlorn-hope.html

Bar Discipline & Process | Permalink

Comments

Post a comment