Sunday, May 19, 2019

Docket Clerk's Relationship Not Imputed To Judge

The South Carolina Advisory Committee on Standards of Judicial Conduct opines

A municipal court judge’s docket clerk is in a relationship with a law enforcement officer for the same municipality. The docket clerk is responsible for scheduling cases and documenting events that occur in cases while in open court. The docket clerk is also responsible for case management, including recording final dispositions in Municipal Court cases and following instructions from the municipal judge(s). The docket clerk appears in court regularly and may be present at the same time that the law enforcement officer the clerk is dating appears to prosecute traffic cases. The municipal court judge inquires as to whether he or she must disclose to all parties the relationship between the docket clerk and the law enforcement officer, or if the docket  clerk should be recused from handling those cases.

Negative

In this case, the judge is not actually involved in a relationship with the law enforcement officer, and there is no cause to question the judge’s impartiality. Furthermore, the docket clerk merely performs ministerial duties regarding case scheduling and management. Thus, there is no need to recuse the docket clerk from cases in which the law enforcement officer appears. Likewise, there is no need for the judge to disclose the relationship of the docket clerk and the law enforcement officer to all parties.

(Mike Frisch)

https://lawprofessors.typepad.com/legal_profession/2019/05/a-view-of-dating-from-the-south-carolina-advisory-committee-on-judicial-ethics-a-municipal-court-judges-docket-clerk-is-i.html

Judicial Ethics and the Courts | Permalink

Comments

Post a comment