Friday, December 7, 2018

Mail Anxiety

A public reprimand from the South Carolina Supreme Court

The complaint against respondent stems from respondent's late responses to initial inquiries in ten disciplinary investigations. Respondent asserts his late responses to the investigations were due to internal mail delivery problems in the business center where he is located. Respondent contends the mail delivery problems resulted in delays in receiving mail from ODC. ODC notes respondent has previously received a confidential admonition for similar conduct and took remedial steps to ensure the internal mail problems did not occur again. However, the problems resurfaced. Respondent acknowledges it is his responsibility to make sure he receives his mail in a timely manner. Accordingly, respondent notes he has obtained a post office box and will check the post office box in a timely manner in order to ensure these issues do not arise again.

Additionally, respondent admits he failed to communicate with his clients in a timely manner because of staffing issues. However, he asserts he has corrected these issues. ODC notes its investigation has not shown any additional misconduct relating to the underlying matters.

The attorney had sought another confidential admonition. (Mike Frisch)

https://lawprofessors.typepad.com/legal_profession/2018/12/a-public-reprimand-from-the-south-carolina-supreme-court-the-complaint-against-respondent-stems-from-respondents-late-respon.html

Bar Discipline & Process | Permalink

Comments

Post a comment