Thursday, February 21, 2013

Client May Discharge Attorney But Contingent Fee Remains Earned

The Rhode Island Supreme Court affirmed the grant of summary judgment to an attorney in a suit for fees against a former client.

The attorney had represented the client in actions against her late father's estate for a 15% contingency fee.

After the claim was reduced to settlement, the attorney collected his fees as payments were recovered. The client later discharged the attorney and claimed no obligation to continue to pay.

The court found that the attorney's rights under the contingent fee agreement had fully vested when the underlying claim was settled. Although the client was free to discharge the attorney, such action "does not alter his entitlement to fees already earned." (Mike Frisch)

Billable Hours, Law & Business, Law Firms | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Client May Discharge Attorney But Contingent Fee Remains Earned:


The Rhode Island Supreme Court appears to have gotten it right in this decision! thanks for keeping us updated.

Posted by: David Slepkow | Mar 2, 2013 9:00:00 AM

I took another look at this case and still believe the RI Supreme Court got this decision correct. Good reasoning

Posted by: David Slepkow | Jun 9, 2017 5:00:10 AM

Post a comment