Thursday, June 28, 2007

Forests, fires, land use laws, and Lake Tahoe …

  Are oppressive governmental land use laws to blame for the loss of so many homes to the big fire south of Lake Tahoe, Cal?

Lake_tahoe   Few places in the United States have seen as much contention and litigation over environmentally spurred land use laws as the Lake Tahoe area, which combines a perfect mix of a great demand for beautiful and expensive real estate, a state with exacting environmental and wildlife laws, and a climate and geography that regularly generates both avalanches and mudslides in wet winter and fires in dry summer.      

  Some residents who recently lost their homes blame the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency, which they see as protecting trees at the expense of homes.  The agency defends by saying that its rules are not as restrictive as some believe.  As in many places in the West, the agency is still behind in plans to conduct prescribed burns, to make up for decades of excessive fire suppression, which has lead to too much small brush.  Moreover, would these residents truly wish to live in area in which most of the trees of their neighbors had been chopped down to avoid fire hazards?  Many a landowner wants to limits his or her neighbor's rights but at the same time wants to be allowed greater personal freedom to cut wood that threatens his or her house.  And they are not placated by the environmentalist argument that maybe people shouldn't be living permanently in such a volatile area in the first place ….

| Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Forests, fires, land use laws, and Lake Tahoe …: