Thursday, June 26, 2008

House Passes ADA Amendments Act of 2008

Congress3The NYT reports that the House yesterday passed 402 to 17, H.R. 3195 (here's the summary), the ADA Amendments Act of 2008, originally introduced as the ADA Restoration Act of 2007. The bill

would make it easier for workers to prove discrimination. It would explicitly relax some stringent standards set by the court and says that disability is to be “construed broadly,” to cover more physical and mental impairments.

Supporters of the proposal said it would restore the broad protections that Congress meant to establish when it passed the Americans With Disabilities Act that President George Bush signed in 1990.

The changes include making clear that a person should be considered disabled even if mitigating measures can help the person function, essentially superseding the Supreme Court's decision in Sutton v. United Airlines

The bill had bipartisan support:

The chief sponsor of the bill, the House Democratic leader, Representative Steny H. Hoyer of Maryland, said the situation was now bizarre. “An individual may be considered too disabled by an employer to get a job, but not disabled enough by the courts to be protected by the A.D.A. from discrimination,” Mr. Hoyer said.

The chief Republican sponsor, Representative F. James Sensenbrenner Jr. of Wisconsin, said the Supreme Court had “chipped away at the protections” of the 1990 law, leaving millions of Americans with no recourse or remedy for discrimination.

The Senate, is expected to pass a similar bipartisan bill. "Senator Tom Harkin, the Iowa Democrat leading the effort, predicted that the Senate would act 'in the near future.'"

The White House has sent cryptic messages about whether the President will veto the bill. "[A]lthough President Bush 'supports the overall intent' of the House bill, he was concerned that it 'could unduly expand' coverage and significantly increase litigation."

A veto might be unlikely if, as the NYT reports,

The House bill reflects a deal worked out in months of negotiations by business groups and advocates for the disabled. The United States Chamber of Commerce and the National Association of Manufacturer helped shape the bill and endorsed it as a balanced compromise.

MM

https://lawprofessors.typepad.com/laborprof_blog/2008/06/house-passes-ad.html

Beltway Developments | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

https://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef00e5537284028833

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference House Passes ADA Amendments Act of 2008:

Comments

I read one of statement: "The White House has sent cryptic messages about whether the President will veto the bill. "[A]lthough President Bush 'supports the overall intent' of the House bill, he was concerned that it 'could unduly expand' coverage and significantly increase litigation."

President Bush and his administration seems concern about "INCREASE LITIGATION" over federal, state and companies' rights than Disabilites' rights. I rather to increase litigastion than nothing because we need to EDUCATE all federal, state and companies that they can not afford to screw around the laws. If they messed up and they should not have the job in first place. Beleive me, litigation will reduce loophole system.

Posted by: The Rogue | Jun 26, 2008 2:42:47 PM

Post a comment