Thursday, August 23, 2007

Suspended NFL Players Sue Under ADA

Nfllogo PlanSponsor.com (free registration required) yesterday brought some recent current events into the realm of employment discrimination law:

Middle linebacker Odell Thurman of the Cincinnati Bengals and Tampa Bay Bucs cornerback Torrie Cox hope to have their suspensions ordered by Commissioner Roger Goodell overturned. The two filed discrimination claims with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC).

The lawsuits were filed with the EEOC under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), and argued that the NFL deems Thurman ad Cox alcoholics. They claim their suspensions violate the ADA, which forbids employers from discriminating against workers with disabilities.

According to ESPN.com, Thurman and Cox cite the suspension of former NBA player Roy Tarpley of the Dallas Mavericks. In Tarpley's case, the EEOC said that the NBA breached the
ADA when it refused to reinstate Tarpley, even though he passed drug screenings for four consecutive years.

This is an interesting dispute as the ADA has very specific language when it comes to treating alcoholism as a disability.  Those currently abusing alcohol are not covered by the ADA, while those who have a record of alcoholism and have received treatment are considered disabled for purposes of the ADA.

So whether Thurman and Cox are successful will largely depend on whether they are still currently abusing alcohol or whether they are in rehabilitation mode.  There is also a subsidiary issue about how long you must be off alcohol before being consider to no longer be a current abuser. Some cases requires two months or more and if these NFL Players were recently suspended for failing a test, they might be out of luck.

PS

https://lawprofessors.typepad.com/laborprof_blog/2007/08/suspended-nfl-p.html

Employment Discrimination | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

https://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef00e54ecec3348833

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Suspended NFL Players Sue Under ADA:

» Suspended NFL players file disabled-rights claims from Overlawyered
Middle linebacker Odell Thurman of the Cincinnati Bengals and Tampa Bay Bucs cornerback Torrie Cox, both suspended for repeat violations of the National Football League's substance abuse policy, filed complaints with the Equal Employment Opportunity... [Read More]

Tracked on Oct 1, 2007 7:27:06 PM

Comments

Thurman was suspended the second time (or his initial suspension extended) for a DUI, not specifically for using alcohol. So what is the rule if the suspension is based not on abusing alcohol itself, but on a violation of a specific legal rule, albeit a violation that occurred because of the disability of alcoholism?

Let's assume that six months of sobriety means someone no longer is actively abusing alcohol. If Thurman's argument flies, does it mean that a league punishment of longer than six months for a DUI (or any other alcohol-related misconduct by an alcoholic) violates the ADA, if the person has stopped drinking? Does it also mean that a criminal punishment of jail time or probation longer than six months for DUI violates the ADA, if the person has stopped drinking? That seems like a boundless argument.

Posted by: Howard Wasserman | Aug 29, 2007 11:52:48 AM

It may be that the players lawyers are simply not making a good case. It happens a lot in ADA lawsuits.

My firm provides litigation support on ADA lawsuits; we see some very pointless lawsuits, stuff that the lawyer has no chance to win. But they may get a settlement that gets the lawyer paid.

Posted by: zak822 | Aug 31, 2007 1:38:07 PM

I would point out that one cannot become under the influence of alcohol without the statutorily defined abuse of alcohol.

A DUI conviction is not only related to the abuse of alcohol, but is in fact proof of the abuse of alcohol.

"Does it also mean that a criminal punishment of jail time or probation longer than six months for DUI violates the ADA, if the person has stopped drinking? That seems like a boundless argument."

Are your sure you want to use the term "boundless"?

Posted by: Joe | Oct 2, 2007 8:10:00 AM

Hi,

I read your article about DUI, I agree with you. Anti-drunk-driving advertising campaigns have aimed to raise awareness of the legal situation and the dangers of driving while intoxicated. Drunk-driving is responsible for a large number of deaths, injuries, damage and accidents every year. In most international jurisdictions, anyone who is convicted of injuring or killing someone while under the influence of alcohol or drugs can be heavily fined, as in France,[6] in addition to being given a lengthy prison sentence.

---------------------------------
Kevin Williams

Suffering from an addiction. This website has a lot of great resources and treatment centers.

[URL]http://www.treatmentcenters.org[/URL]


Posted by: Kevin Williams | May 31, 2008 11:26:42 PM

Post a comment