Thursday, November 16, 2006

Oral Argument Preview for Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire

4united_states_supreme_court_112904_11Update: Ross Runkel agrees with my prediction on the outcome of Ledbetter.

The Cornell Law School's Legal Information Institute (LII) has posted this Supreme Court argument preview on the upcoming Title VII Ledbetter case, which is scheduled for oral argument before the Supreme Court on Monday, November 27th.

Here's a taste:

Lilly Ledbetter sued her employer, Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company, under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, alleging illegal pay discrimination. Prior to filing suit, Ledbetter filed a complaint with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, as required under Title VII, and thereby set the statutory period of her suit to 180 days before she filed the complaint with the Commission. At trial, Ledbetter relied on evidence of allegedly discriminatory salary reviews that occurred before the statutory period to prove that the amount of the paychecks that she received within the statutory period were discriminatorily low. The jury found that Goodyear had paid Ledbetter a lower salary because of unlawful sex discrimination, in violation of Title VII.  Goodyear appealed, arguing that Title VII’s statutory time period should limit Ledbetter’s evidence to the two incidents of allegedly discriminatory conduct that occurred within the statutory period. Further, Goodyear argued that it did not illegally discriminate against Ledbetter during either incident. The Eleventh Circuit agreed, and dismissed the case. The Court’s decision in this case will affect employees’ ability to file equal pay claims under Title VII, as well as employers’ ability to defend themselves against such claims.

You can also read about my musings and predictions on Ledbetter at this previous post.


Employment Discrimination | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Oral Argument Preview for Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire:


Post a comment