Monday, June 15, 2020

Supreme Court Denies Cert in United States v. California, State Sanctuary Law Case

330px-Donald_Trump_official_portrait

Today, the U.S. Supreme Court denied certiorari in United States v. California, the challenge to the Golden State's sanctuary laws.  The district court rejected most of the U.S. governments claims and the Ninth Circuit in large part affirmed.

I called the Court's cert denial last November:

"[In] United States v. California, . . . the Ninth Circuit (mostly affirming the ruling of District Judge John Mendez) rejected most of the U.S. government's claims that California's `sanctuary' laws were preempted by federal immigration law. 

In United States v. California, the issue presented is whether provisions of California law that, with certain limited exceptions, prohibit state law-enforcement officials from providing federal immigration authorities with release dates and other information about individuals subject to federal immigration enforcement, and restrict the transfer of noncitizens in state custody to federal immigration custody, are preempted by federal law or barred by intergovernmental immunity.

It is always hard to say whether the Supreme Court will grant a cert petition.  Nonetheless.  the Court may be disinclined to grant the petition in light of (1) the thorough preemption analysis of the lower courts; (2) the Ninth Circuit opinion was written by Judge Milan Smith, a George W. Bush appointee; and (3) the fact that the Court has a relatively large number of immigration cases on its docket." (bold added).

 KJ

https://lawprofessors.typepad.com/immigration/2020/06/supreme-court-denies-cert-in-united-states-v-california-state-sanctuary-law-case.html

Current Affairs | Permalink

Comments

Post a comment