Wednesday, May 6, 2020
President Trump's immigration initiatives have given much fodder to the federal judiciary. Peter Margulies offers thoughts on an important ruling from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on the President's latest proclamation:
"In a ruling on May 4 in Doe v. Trump, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied the government's request for a stay of a nationwide preliminary injunction against an October 2019 presidential proclamation barring admission of immigrants without `approved' health insurance. In the majority were Ninth Circuit Judges Sidney Thomas and Marsha Berzon; Judge Daniel Bress dissented." Click the link above to read Margulies' analysis.