Tuesday, July 30, 2019

Immigration Article of the Day: Paradoxes of Protection: Compassionate Repression at the Mexico–Guatemala Border

Paradoxes of Protection: Compassionate Repression at the Mexico–Guatemala Border

 

Rebecca Galemba 

Katie Dingeman

Kaelyn DeVries 

Yvette Servin

In this article, we examine a novel set of data from migrant shelters — 16 qualitative interviews with migrants and nine with staff and advocates in the Mexico–Guatemala border region, as well as 118 complaints of abuses committed along migrants’ journeys — informally filed by migrants at a shelter on the Guatemalan side of the border, and an additional eight complaints filed at a shelter on the Mexican side of the border. We document and analyze the nature, location, and perpetrators of these alleged abuses, using a framework of “compassionate repression” (Fassin 2012) to examine the obstacles that migrants encounter in denouncing abuses and seeking protection. We contend that while humanitarian visas can provide necessary protection for abuses committed in Mexico, they are limited by their temporary nature, by being nested within a migration system that prioritizes migrant removal, and because they recognize only crimes that occur in Mexico. The paradox between humanitarian concerns and repressive migration governance in a context of high impunity shapes institutional and practical obstacles to reporting crimes, receiving visas, and accessing justice. In this context, a variety of actors recognize that they can exploit and profit from migrants’ lack of mobility, legal vulnerability, and uncertain access to protection, leading to a commodification of access to humanitarian protection along the route.

Guatemala-Mexico border

MHC

https://lawprofessors.typepad.com/immigration/2019/07/from-the-bookshelves-paradoxes-of-protection-compassionate-repression-at-the-mexicoguatemala-border-.html

Books | Permalink

Comments

Post a comment