Wednesday, October 4, 2017

Argument analysis: Justices seem primed to find constitutional limits on the detention of immigrants

Scous_seal

Here is my analysis of the oral arguments in the Supreme Court in Jennings v. Rodriguez, an immigrant detention case. My bottom line:

"As the reargument made clear, this case raises some fascinating constitutional questions, which now are squarely before the court. The justices seemed primed to find constitutional limits on the detention of immigrants. They seemed less troubled than they had been in the first argument by the six-month period for bond hearings established by the 9th Circuit, with the discussion about the reasonableness of the six-month period seeming to assuage their concerns.

Ultimately, this case offers the Supreme Court the opportunity to address the modern vitality of the plenary-power doctrine and finally decide whether, and if so how, the Constitution applies to arriving aliens. We will likely have to wait a few months longer to find out how the justices resolve that issue, which has significant implications in the immigration-law arena."

KJ

https://lawprofessors.typepad.com/immigration/2017/10/argument-analysis-justices-seem-primed-to-find-constitutional-limits-on-the-detention-of-immigrants.html

Current Affairs | Permalink

Comments

Post a comment