Monday, July 11, 2011 on-line symposium on Arizona v. United States is having an on-line symposium this week on Arizona v. United States.  Arizona's cert petition in the case is due in the next few weeks.

Here is my contribution (S.B. 1070: Federal preemption and why the Court won’t address civil rights issues).

I will update this entry as other contributions are posted.

Richard Samp, Washington Legal Foundation, The constitutionality of S.B. 1070

Peter Spiro, Temple, Why the Court will duck S.B. 1070 case (for now)

Roderick Hills, NYU, Textualism and open questions about S.B. 1070

Carissa Hessick, Arizona State University, Mirror image theory in state immigration regulation

Rogers Smith, University of Pennsylvania, The constitutionality of “attrition through enforcement”

Ilya Shapiro, Cato Institute, S.B. 1070: Constitutional but bad policy

Carol Swain, Vanderbilt, Why the Court should uphold S.B.1070 

Hope Lewis, Northeastern, Human rights implications of Arizona v. United States

Margaret Stock, professor at the University of Alaska Anchorage and Counsel to the firm at Lane Powell PC,  Arizona v. United States: The tail wagging the dog on regulating immigration enforcement

Lauren Gilbert, St. Thomas, Presuming preemption: Implications of Chamber of Commerce v. Whiting

Larry Joseph, Arizona v. United States:Narrowing “prevent-or-frustrate” conflict preemption


Current Affairs | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference on-line symposium on Arizona v. United States: