Tuesday, March 29, 2011

Security First Argument is a Red Herring

From the Center for American Progress:

The “Border Security First” Argument: A Red Herring Undermining Real Security
Assessing DHS Progress and Looking Forward
By Marshall Fitz, Angela Maria Kelley, Ann Garcia

Opponents of comprehensive immigration reform argue that we need a fully secure border before we can systemically overhaul our immigration laws. Ironically, the “border security first” mantra is actually thwarting progress on border security.

This brief shows that the Department of Homeland Security met and exceeded stringent enforcement benchmarks that “border security first” supporters laid out in legislation that failed to pass Congress in 2007.

It is past time to put aside this tired expression and start working on comprehensive solutions to fix the system.

Read more and download this issue brief here.

bh

https://lawprofessors.typepad.com/immigration/2011/03/security-first-argument-is-a-red-herring.html

| Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

https://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef014e6033a7d5970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Security First Argument is a Red Herring: