HealthLawProf Blog

Editor: Katharine Van Tassel
Case Western Reserve University School of Law

Sunday, November 29, 2020

Family Fiduciaries in the Protective Jurisdiction

Ben Chen (The University of Sydney), Family Fiduciaries in the Protective Jurisdiction, 44 (1) Melbourne U. L. Rev. (2020):

Baby boomers in Australia are entering retirement with a higher life expectancy and more wealth than any generation before them. Mental and physical decline can make it difficult or impractical for many older people to safeguard their own financial interests. In particular, guardians and attorneys who manage property for the elderly have the opportunity to misuse their power to enrich themselves. Responding to recommendations from law reform commissions, Australian legislatures tend to impose the strictest form of fiduciary regulation on guardians and attorneys. Bucking the trend, this article argues in favour of a flexible model of fiduciary regulation. This model originates from historical Chancery jurisprudence and continues to enjoy support in New South Wales. The prevailing, strict model not only tends to be overprotective, it also ignores the reality that litigation about the properties of the elderly is often driven by inheritance expectations. The flexible model can alleviate the potential overprotectiveness of fiduciary law and accommodate harmless conflicts in close families.

https://lawprofessors.typepad.com/healthlawprof_blog/2020/11/family-fiduciaries-in-the-protective-jurisdiction.html

| Permalink

Comments

Post a comment