Family Law Prof Blog

Editor: Margaret Ryznar
Indiana University
Robert H. McKinney School of Law

Monday, March 30, 2015

Young v. United States Parcel Service

 Professors Naomi Cahn & June Carbone, on the GWU Law Review blog:

At the core of the Court’s decision in Young v. United Parcel Service is a fundamental question of feminist jurisprudence: should women be treated the same as men, or should they receive special treatment?1 Which strategy would better achieve gender equality?2 The debate itself is decades-old, and the Court has—appropriately enough—zigged and zagged in its resolution of the issues.3

Liberal feminists have sought to emphasize women’s similarities to men, arguing that women do not need special treatment to “compensate” for the physical reality that women can become pregnant; on the other hand, women should not be treated differently and penalized when they do become pregnant.4 Thus, in a case that helped served as a catalyst for the Pregnancy Discrimination Act’s enactment, General Electric Co. excluded pregnant workers from its temporary disability benefits plan, and liberal feminists argued that the deliberate exclusion of pregnant workers constituted sex discrimination. The Court, however, held that the policy did not discriminate on the basis of sex because (ahem), “an exclusion of pregnancy from a disability-benefits plan providing general coverage is not a gender-based discrimination at all. Pregnancy is, of course, confined to women, but it is in other ways significantly different from the typical covered disease or disability.”5 This reasoning echoed an earlier opinion, in which the Court noted that a program which divided people “into two groups—pregnant women and nonpregnant persons”—did not necessarily constitute discrimination under the Equal Protection Clause.6

Read more here.

MR

https://lawprofessors.typepad.com/family_law/2015/03/young-v-united-states-parcel-service.html

| Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

https://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef01b7c76d7d6d970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Young v. United States Parcel Service:

Comments

I find it interesting to learn that liberal feminists have sought to emphasize women’s similarities to men, arguing that women do not need special treatment to “compensate” for the physical reality that women can become pregnant. In fact the issue resumes on to the point that women should not be treated differently and penalized when they do become pregnant. I think this is not a cool idea at all. As a women, I feel like men and women are very different and have different roles to play.

Posted by: Paige Smith | Mar 30, 2015 9:14:38 AM

Post a comment