CrimProf Blog

Editor: Kevin Cole
Univ. of San Diego School of Law

Monday, April 19, 2021

Kitai-Sangero on Self-Incrimination, Physical Exams, and Documents

Rinat Kitai-Sangero (Zefat Academic College) has posted The Protection of Free Choice and the Right to Passivity: Applying the Privilege against Self-Incrimination to Physical Examinations and Documents' Submission (William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal, Vol. 29, 2020) on SSRN. Here is the abstract:
 
The article addresses the question of whether the privilege against self-incrimination should cover physical examinations as well as the obligation to submit documents. This question requires a serious examination of the justifications underlying the privilege against self-incrimination and is of particular relevance in the current age of technological progress that expand the powers assigned to law-enforcement agencies to access knowledge and thoughts stored in individuals' minds. After addressing the comparative law regarding the applicability of the privilege against self-incrimination to physical examinations and to the obligation to submit documents and discussing key justifications for the privilege against self-incrimination, dividing them into epistemic and non-epistemic, and examining in light of them whether there is a valid distinction between compelled speech and compelled physical examinations, and documents' submission, the article concludes that extending the privilege against self-incrimination to physical examinations and to the obligation to submit documents is necessary to protect accused persons' free will to choose their defense strategy given the burden imposed on the state to prove guilt as a condition for securing convictions.

https://lawprofessors.typepad.com/crimprof_blog/2021/04/kitai-sangero-on-self-incrimination-physical-exams-and-documents.html

| Permalink

Comments

Post a comment