Friday, May 17, 2019
During his 43 years as a federal appellate judge, Anthony M. Kennedy authored over 350 opinions in cases relevant to criminal law (although establishing a precise number using various electronic databases offers a cautionary tale). Below I offer four general themes that emerge from my review of Justice Kennedy’s written work in criminal cases:
(1) Perhaps surprising to some, when writing for the majority, Justice Kennedy ruled more often for a defense-side view than for the government;
(2) His expansive vision of “liberty,” as expressed in civil cases, was more “balanced” in the criminal context;
(3) His balanced-liberty approach was less defendant-friendly in habeas cases; and
(4) His work was most impactful in (obviously?) death penalty and race-focused cases, as well as plea-bargaining; and he was consistently correct about the doctrine of “willful blindness.”
In conclusion, Justice Kennedy’s 30 years of writings on the U.S. Supreme Court mark him as one of the most influential Justices of our time in shaping criminal law doctrine.
Note: This is a pre-publication copy. Pages and references may change.