CrimProf Blog

Editor: Kevin Cole
Univ. of San Diego School of Law

Tuesday, April 9, 2019

Marshall on Miller v. Alabama and Prediction

Mary Marshall (Columbia University, Law School, Students) has posted Miller v. Alabama and the Problem of Prediction (Columbia Law Review, Forthcoming) on SSRN. Here is the abstract:
 
Beginning in 2010, the Supreme Court severely limited states’ ability to impose juvenile life without parole sentences. In a seminal case, Miller v. Alabama, the Court banned mandatory life without the possibility of parole sentences for juveniles and declared that only those juveniles that are “irreparable corrupt” should be made to spend the rest of their lives in prison. While Miller has been the subject of much scholarly debate, there has yet to be any discussion of a core instability at the center of Miller’s mandate: By limiting life without parole sentences only to those juveniles who are “irreparably corrupt” the Court is asking sentencers to predict whether a juvenile will be a danger decades down the road and after a long prison sentence. This Note uses legal and social science literature around the impossibility of long-term predictions about juvenile development to argue that the requirement of prediction in Miller prevents just application of the decision and argues that this instability should lead to a ban on juvenile life without parole sentences.

https://lawprofessors.typepad.com/crimprof_blog/2019/04/marshall-on-miller-v-alabama-and-prediction.html

| Permalink

Comments

Post a comment