CrimProf Blog

Editor: Kevin Cole
Univ. of San Diego School of Law

Tuesday, February 12, 2019

Hill et al. on Entrapment

Daniel HillStephen McLeod and Attila Tanyi (Department of Philosophy, University of Liverpool and Department of Philosophy (IFF)) have posted The Concept of Entrapment (Criminal Law and Philosophy 2018, 12: 539-554) on SSRN. Here is the abstract:
Our question is this: What makes an act one of entrapment? We make a standard distinction between legal entrapment, which is carried out by parties acting in their capacities as (or as deputies of) law-enforcement agents, and civil entrapment, which is not. We aim to provide a definition of entrapment that covers both and which, for reasons we explain, does not settle questions of permissibility and culpability. We explain, com- pare, and contrast two existing definitions of legal entrapment to commit a crime that possess this neutrality. We point out some problems with the extensional correctness of these definitions and propose a new definition that resolves these problems. We then extend our definition to provide a more general definition of entrapment, encompassing both civil and legal cases. Our definition is, we believe, closer to being extensionally correct and will, we hope, provide a clearer basis for future discussions about the ethics of entrapment than do the definitions upon which it improves.

| Permalink


this question is reliable but my question is Criminal Law Will Be A Thing Of The Past And Here's Why?

Posted by: Lucas Goodwin | Feb 18, 2019 12:47:47 AM

Post a comment