CrimProf Blog

Editor: Kevin Cole
Univ. of San Diego School of Law

Friday, February 2, 2018

"Michigan sex offender registration law held unconstitutional"

From Collateral Consequences Resource Center, via the NACDL news feed. In part:

On January 24, the Michigan Supreme Court held the state’s sex offender registration scheme unconstitutional on due process grounds as applied to one Boban Temelkoski.  Temelkoski had pleaded guilty under a youthful offender statute with the expectation that no collateral consequences would attach to the disposition if he successfully completed its conditions.  However, several years later a registration requirement was enacted and applied retroactively to his case.  Because the court decided Temelkoski’s case on due process grounds, it did not need to address arguments that application of the registration statute to him constituted constitutionally impermissible punishment.  However, the court hinted in dicta how it might decide that issue, stating that “It is undisputed that registration under SORA constitutes a civil disability.”  While a win is a win, we must wait another day for a decision on the constitutionality of Michigan’s registration scheme under the Ex Post Facto Clause and the State’s version of the Eighth Amendment.

https://lawprofessors.typepad.com/crimprof_blog/2018/02/michigan-sex-offender-registration-law-held-unconstitutional.html

| Permalink

Comments

Post a comment