CrimProf Blog

Editor: Kevin Cole
Univ. of San Diego School of Law

Friday, August 14, 2015

"Computer searches and the problem of withdrawn consent"

Orin Kerr has this post at The Volokh Conspiracy. In part:

Computer searches usually happen in two stages. Agents take the computer, make a mirror image copy of its hard drive on a government storage device, and then search the image. Officers do this to ensure the integrity of the original data. Searching can alter the contents on the computer, so working from a copy preserves the original.

This two-step procedure raises an interesting puzzle for consent doctrine. What happens if a target consents to a computer search, the agents quickly make a copy, and then the target revokes consent before the image is searched? Everyone agrees that the officer can’t search the target’s own computer after consent was withdrawn. But can the officer search the copy? Is the copy now the government’s to search regardless of the suspect’s revocation, or should the revocation of consent cover both the original and the copy?

https://lawprofessors.typepad.com/crimprof_blog/2015/08/computer-searches-and-the-problem-of-withdrawn-consent.html

| Permalink

Comments

Post a comment