CrimProf Blog

Editor: Kevin Cole
Univ. of San Diego School of Law

Tuesday, May 5, 2015

Anderson et al. on Punishments for Repeat Offenders

Lisa R. Anderson Gregory J. DeAngelo Winand Emons Beth Freeborn and Hannes Lang (College of William and Mary - Department of Economics , Texas Tech University - Department of Economics and Geography , University of Bern - Department of Economics , Government of the United States of America - Federal Trade Commission and Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (RPI)) have posted Penalty Structures and Deterrence in a Two-Stage Model: Experimental Evidence on SSRN. Here is the abstract:

Increasing penalty structures for repeat offenses are ubiquitous in penal codes, despite little empirical or theoretical support. Multi-period models of criminal enforcement based on the standard economic approach of Becker (1968) generally find that the optimal penalty structure is either flat or declining. We experimentally test a two-stage theoretical model that predicts decreasing penalty structures will yield greater deterrence than increasing penalty structures. We find that decreasing fine structures are more effective at reducing risky behavior. Additionally, our econometric analyses reveal a number of behavioral findings. Subjects are deterred by past convictions, even though the probability of detection is independent across decisions. Further, subjects appear to take the two-stage nature of the decision making task into account, suggesting that subjects consider both current and future penalties. Even controlling for the fine a subject faces for any given decision, being in a decreasing fine structure has a significant effect on deterrence.

| Permalink


Comment timed out before I could sign off. I was trying to tell the story of Pete and Repete in Ferguson, Missouri back in the early 1960s.

Posted by: Liberty1st | May 9, 2015 1:46:06 PM

Every thing in moderation. Including moderation.

Posted by: Liberty1st | May 9, 2015 1:47:29 PM

Post a comment