CrimProf Blog

Editor: Kevin Cole
Univ. of San Diego School of Law

Tuesday, May 10, 2011

Murphy on DNA and the Fifth Amendment

Murphy erin Erin Murphy (New York University School of Law) has posted DNA and the Fifth Amendment on SSRN. Here is the abstract:

Challenges to the collection and databasing of DNA samples almost always proceed under the Fourth Amendment. The Fifth Amendment is rarely considered a viable legal claim, largely due to the longstanding distinction between testimonial evidence, which receives Fifth Amendment protection, and non-testimonial evidence, which does not. In this short essay, written as a chapter in a book celebrating the life and work of Professor William J. Stuntz, I draw upon United States v. Hubbell as a means of arguing that the Fifth Amendment might in fact cover certain kinds of DNA investigative activity. Specifically, I analogize a requirement to produce documents otherwise unknown to investigators, which the Court found to constitute self-incrimination, to a requirement that defendants provide a DNA sample not to match a specific crime scene, but so that investigators can compile DNA databases to troll for matches. In both cases, the concern is that investigators compel information from a suspect in order to create rather than confirm suspicion, and thus the Fifth Amendment ought to apply.

https://lawprofessors.typepad.com/crimprof_blog/2011/05/murphy-on-dna-and-the-fifth-amendment.html

| Permalink

Comments

Post a comment