Monday, November 3, 2008
The Criminal Justice Reform Battle in California: Cynical Politicians and Powerful Interests Attacking the Public Good
Here is picture that sums up much that is wrong with American politics. Five governors of California, Democrats and Republicans, joining forces to oppose something that is indisputably in the public interest.
This is an image that could be repeated, with different faces, in region after region of our country, involving issue after issue. Public officials standing against the public good, with the disastrous results on display from Detroit to Wall Street. All suffering from the same destructive force: the power of entrenched special interests to cloud the vision of our leaders, causing them to thwart good sense, good legislation, and the will of the people.
In today's version, we have Jerry Brown, Pete Wilson, Gray Davis, George Deukmejian, and Arnold Schwarzenegger coming together to oppose Prop 5, a common sense ballot initiative that seeks to effectively and intelligently tackle the chronic problems facing California's deeply flawed criminal justice system.
California's prisons are a budget-busting debacle. There are currently more than 170,000 inmates crammed into prisons designed to hold 100,000 people. Around 70,000 of these prisoners are nonviolent offenders, with over half of them incarcerated for a drug offense.
A large part of the problem is a parole system the New York Times recently called "perhaps the most counterproductive and ill-conceived" in the U.S.. California's recidivism rate is 70 percent -- twice the national average. This stems in no small measure from the state's insistence on treating paroled murderers the same way as paroled nonviolent drug offenders. They all spend 3-5 years on parole. This overburdens parole officers, who end up spending very little time with any of their charges -- violent or nonviolent (According to the Times, 80 percent of California parolees have fewer than two 15-minute meetings with their parole officer per month.) Wouldn't it make more sense to keep a closer watch on rapists and killers than on nonviolent drug offenders? [Mark Godsey]
Continue Reading "The Criminal Justice Reform Battle in California: Cynical Politicians and Powerful Interests Attacking the Public Good"
Past in the 1984, the American lawyer people, them were making ready to, give pay, to the mister Howard Hughes natural legally son, after the American presidency 1984 them find out he were poor living and working in the Los Angeles California area, many lawyer people, them were interested, in giving the rights, to the mister Hughes son, actually it because the mister Hughes son, he legally became to be, the owner from his father’s business places any where, plus his son he attend to the reading of the mister Hughes will testament from money and business places in the 1960 to 1961, in a court room in the California state, after the presidency mean it this, many director people from many business places them men to be, that the mister Hughes son he must to be going to the Swiss country, to get pay, after all, many lawyer people, them find out that many directors from the mister Hughes business places, them are been making thieves, upon them find very easy to object, that cut be a felony or a crime, to avoid the laws commands, or in the last the laws command, is not except for the gay director people, them want it to say.
Posted by: anonymous | Jan 6, 2009 5:10:49 AM