Thursday, December 23, 2004
CrimProf Scheck: We Are On Verge of Historic Reforms in Eyewitness Identification Procedures
Cardoza CrimProf Barry Scheck, president of the National Association of Criminal Defense Attorneys, writes this month's column in the magazine Champion: "Soon, the single greatest
cause of the conviction of the innocent -- mistaken eyewitness
identification -- will be significantly redressed by a series of
historic reforms: We will see photo arrays and lineups conducted by a
blinded examiner (the person running the procedure doesn't know the
identity of the suspect); proper admonitions to witnesses that the real
perpetrator may not be present; proper selection of fillers so they
meet the description of the perpetrator, not the suspect; confidence
statements from witnesses at the time of identification in their own
words; and sequential presentation at identification procedures with an
adequate number of fillers (at least five). Based on strong scientific
proof that these reforms substantially reduce error and increase the
capacity of police to find the real assailant, courts, legislatures,
and prosecutors will adopt them because it's just good law enforcement.
But they will also act because there is a constitutional imperative at
work: The heart of the Supreme Court's due process jurisprudence in
this area is to prohibit systemic practices that unnecessarily increase
error.
These reforms will move on three different tracks
simultaneously. On one track, state and federal courts will reverse and
revise Manson v. Braithwaite, instructing juries that failure to follow
procedures that demonstrably reduce error must be held against the
prosecution. Similarly, courts at pre-trial hearings will consider
expert testimony and assess the taint from improper suggestiveness in
light of new scientific evidence. On a second track, where trains are
already in motion, police and prosecutors will voluntarily implement
these reforms, following the lead of New Jersey, North Carolina,
Minneapolis, Boston, Santa Clara (Calif.), and Northhampton (Mass.).
And finally, state legislatures and Congress will follow the lead of
Illinois, as well as suggestions from the American Bar Association, and
enact bills funding pilot projects, research, and training." Full column here. [Mark Godsey]
https://lawprofessors.typepad.com/crimprof_blog/2004/12/crimprof_scheck.html