ContractsProf Blog

Editor: Myanna Dellinger
University of South Dakota School of Law

Monday, October 1, 2018

How to draft a forum selection clause

A recent decision out of the District of Oregon, Summit Foods, Inc. v. Viking Packaging Technologies, Inc., Case No. 3:18-cv-1470-SI, debated whether a forum selection clause was mandatory or permissive, and so provides some lessons if you're trying to draft one of these. 

The defendant was arguing that the forum selection clause was mandatory, but the court found that was reading the clause "through rose-colored glasses." The clause said that "[t]he courts of Sheboygan County Wisconsin will have jurisdiction." The court, however, noted that the clause was silent as to whether any other jurisdiction might also have jurisdiction. There was no language indicating that Sheboygan County would have exclusive jurisdiction. A mandatory forum selection one is one that contains such language of exclusivity. The forum selection clause in this case was therefore held to be permissive.

Recent Cases, True Contracts | Permalink


I also make decisions about different things, especially about dog fence. I hope you agree with it. and this is what you should do it.

Posted by: petsafe fence wire | Nov 1, 2019 11:33:32 AM

Very elaborate and insightful article. It gives me a fair amount of knowledge. It helps a lot for my work.

Posted by: vex 3 | Nov 5, 2019 11:09:15 PM

Post a comment

If you do not complete your comment within 15 minutes, it will be lost. For longer comments, you may want to draft them in Word or another program and then copy them into this comment box.